Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 15;20(6):5206.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065206.

Impact of the Frequency and Type of Procedures Performed in Nuclear Medicine Units on the Expected Radiological Hazard

Affiliations

Impact of the Frequency and Type of Procedures Performed in Nuclear Medicine Units on the Expected Radiological Hazard

Katarzyna Matusiak et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Nuclear medicine procedures play an important role in medical diagnostics and therapy. They are related to the use of ionizing radiation, which affects the radiological exposure of all of the persons involved in their performance. The goal of the study was to estimate the doses associated with the performance of various nuclear medicine procedures in order to optimize workload management. The analysis was performed for 158 myocardial perfusion scintigraphy procedures, 24 bone scintigraphies, 9 thyroid scintigraphies (6 with use of 131I and 3 with 99mTc), 5 parathyroid glands and 5 renal scintigraphies. In this evaluation, two possible locations of thermoluminescent detectors, used for measurements, were taken into consideration: in the control room and directly next to the patient. It was shown how the radiological exposure varies depending on the performed procedure. For high activity procedures, ambient dose equivalent registered in the control room reached the level over 50% of allowed dose limit. For example, ambient dose equivalent obtained in control room when performing bone scintigraphy only was 1.13 ± 0.3 mSv. It is 68% of calculated dose limit in the examined time span. It has been shown that risk associated with nuclear medicine procedures is influenced not only by the type of procedure, but also by the frequency of their performance and compliance with the ALARA principle. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy accounted for 79% of all evaluated procedures. The use of radiation shielding reduced the obtained doses from 14.7 ± 2.1 mSv in patient's vicinity to 1.47 ± 0.6 mSv behind the shielding. By comparing the results obtained for procedures and dose limits established by Polish Ministry of Health, it is possible to estimate what should be the optimal division of duties between staff, so that everyone receives similar doses.

Keywords: TLD; dose estimation; medical staff radiological exposure; nuclear medicine procedures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic drawing of D-SPECT acquisition room with detectors’ locations (red circles).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic drawing of Mediso Anyscan acquisition room with detectors’ locations (red circles).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic drawing of Philips BrightView acquisition room with detectors’ locations (red circles).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of the doses absorbed by TLDs located next to the patient and in the control room for all procedures.

References

    1. Nuclear Medicine. [(accessed on 5 July 2020)]. Available online: https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/treatment-tests-and-therapies/nuc....
    1. Committee on State of the Science of Nuclear Medicine. Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board. Board on Health Sciences Policy. Division on Earth and Life Studies. National Research Council . Advancing Nuclear Medicine Through Innovation. National Academies Press; Washington, DC, USA: 2007. p. 1.
    1. Bevelacqua J.J. Skin contaminations, internal intakes and ALARA. Radiat. Prot. Manag. 2004;21:11–16.
    1. Miller D., Schauer D. The ALARA principle in medical imaging. AAPM Newsl. 2015;40:38–40.
    1. Huda W. Radiation Risk: What is to Be Done? Am. J. Roentgenol. 2015;204:124–127. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12834. - DOI - PubMed