Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb 28;13(3):434.
doi: 10.3390/jpm13030434.

How to Measure Foot Self-Care? A Methodological Review of Instruments

Affiliations
Review

How to Measure Foot Self-Care? A Methodological Review of Instruments

Jenni Sipilä et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

Foot self-care is an important element of caring for and promoting foot health. However, little is known about the validity and reliability of existing foot self-care instruments. The purpose of this review is to describe and analyze the focus, content, and psychometric evidence of existing instruments for measuring foot self-care. A methodological review of three international scientific databases-Medline (PubMed), CINAHL (Ebsco), and Embase-was conducted in May 2022. The search produced 3520 hits, of which 53 studies were included in the final analysis based on a two-phase selection process. A total of 31 instruments were identified, of which six were observed to have been used more than once. Subsequently, the methodological quality of these six instruments was evaluated. It is noted that although a considerable variety of instruments are used in measuring foot self-care, only a small proportion are used consistently. In general, the psychometric testing instruments seem to primarily focus on analyzing content validity and homogeneity. In the future, comprehensive testing of instrument psychometrics could enhance the cumulative evidence of the methodological quality of these instruments. Furthermore, researchers and clinicians can use the information in this review to make informed choices when selecting an instrument for their purposes.

Keywords: foot; foot self-care; instrument; measurement; methodological review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study selection process.

References

    1. Muchna A., Najafi B.B., Wendel C.S., Schwenk M., Armstrong D.G., Mohler J. Foot problems in older adults associations with incident falls, frailty syndrome, and sensor-derived gait, balance, and physical activity measures. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2018;108:126–139. doi: 10.7547/15-186. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kunkel D., Mamode L., Burnett M., Pickering R., Bader D., Donovan-Hall M., Cole M., Ashburn A., Bowen C. Footwear characteristics and foot problems in community dwelling people with stroke: A cross-sectional observational study. Disabil. Rehabil. 2022:1–8. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2102679. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilson O., Hewlett S., Woodburn J., Pollock J., Kirwan J. Prevalence, impact and care of foot problems in people with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from a United Kingdom based cross-sectional survey. J. Foot Ankle Res. 2017;10:46. doi: 10.1186/s13047-017-0229-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simonsen M.B., Hørslev-Petersen K., Cöster M.C., Jensen C., Bremander A. Foot and ankle problems in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in 2019: Still an important issue. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2021;3:396–402. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11258. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tang U.H., Zügner R., Lisovskaja V., Karlsson J., Hagberg K., Tranberg R. Foot deformities, function in the lower extremities, and plantar pressure in patients with diabetes at high risk to develop foot ulcers. Diabet. Foot Ankle. 2015;6:27593. doi: 10.3402/dfa.v6.27593. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources