Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb 23;13(3):621.
doi: 10.3390/life13030621.

Assessment of Exercise Capacity in Post-COVID-19 Patients: How Is the Appropriate Test Chosen?

Affiliations
Review

Assessment of Exercise Capacity in Post-COVID-19 Patients: How Is the Appropriate Test Chosen?

Rodrigo Torres-Castro et al. Life (Basel). .

Abstract

There is a wide range of sequelae affecting COVID-19 survivors, including impaired physical capacity. These sequelae can affect the quality of life and return to work of the active population. Therefore, one of the pillars of following-up is the evaluation of physical capacity, which can be assessed with field tests (such as the six-minute walk test, the one-minute standing test, the Chester step test, and the shuttle walking test) or laboratory tests (such as the cardiopulmonary exercise test). These tests can be performed in different contexts and have amply demonstrated their usefulness in the assessment of physical capacity both in post-COVID-19 patients and in other chronic respiratory, metabolic, cardiologic, or neurologic diseases. However, when traditional tests cannot be performed, physical function can be a good substitute, especially for assessing the effects of an intervention. For example, the Short Physical Performance Battery assessment and the Timed Up and Go assessment are widely accepted in older adults. Thus, the test should be chosen according to the characteristics of each subject.

Keywords: exercise capacity; post-COVID-19; tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of different laboratory and field tests.

References

    1. John Hopkins University, COVID-19 Dashboard by Centre for Systems Science and Engineering at the John Hopkins University. 2022. [(accessed on 25 December 2022)]. Available online: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html.
    1. Berlin D., Gulick R., Martinez F. Severe COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:2451–2460. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp2009575. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Empson S., Rogers A., Wilson J. COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: One Pathogen, Multiple Phenotypes. Crit. Care Clin. 2022;38:505–519. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2022.02.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Núñez-Cortés R., Rivera-Lillo G., Arias-Campoverde M., Soto-García D., García-Palomera R., Torres-Castro R. Use of sit-to-stand test to assess the physical capacity and exertional desaturation in patients post COVID-19. Chron. Respir. Dis. 2021;18:1479973121999205. doi: 10.1177/1479973121999205. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paneroni M., Simonelli C., Saleri M., Bertacchini L., Venturelli M., Troosters T., Ambrosino N., Vitacca M. Muscle Strength and Physical Performance in Patients without Previous Disabilities Recovering From COVID-19 Pneumonia. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2021;100:105–109. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001641. - DOI - PubMed