Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 22;15(3):1015.
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15031015.

Sinonasal Stent Coated with Sustained-Release Varnish of Mometasone Furoate Inhibits Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Release from Macrophages: An In Vitro Study

Affiliations

Sinonasal Stent Coated with Sustained-Release Varnish of Mometasone Furoate Inhibits Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Release from Macrophages: An In Vitro Study

Alessandra Cataldo Russomando et al. Pharmaceutics. .

Abstract

The aim of the study was to develop a sustained-release varnish (SRV) containing mometasone furoate (MMF) for sinonasal stents (SNS) to reduce mucosa inflammation in the sinonasal cavity. The SNS' segments coated with SRV-MMF or an SRV-placebo were incubated daily in a fresh DMEM at 37 °C for 20 days. The immunosuppressive activity of the collected DMEM supernatants was tested on the ability of mouse RAW 264.7 macrophages to secrete the cytokines' tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and interleukin (IL)-10 and IL-6 in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The cytokine levels were determined by respective Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISAs). We found that the daily amount of MMF released from the coated SNS was sufficient to significantly inhibit LPS-induced IL-6 and IL-10 secretion from the macrophages up to days 14 and 17, respectively. SRV-MMF had, however, only a mild inhibitory effect on LPS-induced TNFα secretion as compared to the SRV-placebo-coated SNS. In conclusion, the coating of SNS with SRV-MMF provides a sustained delivery of MMF for at least 2 weeks, maintaining a level sufficient for inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokine release. This technological platform is, therefore, expected to provide anti-inflammatory benefits during the postoperative healing period and may play a significant role in the future treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis.

Keywords: chronic rhinosinusitis; cytokine; local drug delivery; nasal stent; steroids; sustained-release varnish.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) SNS without varnish. (B) SRV-MMF-coated stent. The coating was retained on both the polyurethane plastic material and the nitinol wires.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) DMF-differentiated PLB-985 cells were exposed to different concentrations of MMF (0.1, 1.0, and 10 µg/mL) and/or 10 ng/mL TNFα, and the ROS production was followed by monitoring the luminescence each minute for 60 min. MMF only slightly affected the TNFα-induced ROS production. (B) The same setup experiment as in (A) but with 100 ng/mL TNFα. At this TNFα concentration, the presence of 1.0 and 10 µg/mL MMF did not interfere with the TNFα-induced ROS production, and 0.1 µg/mL MMF even increased the TNFα-induced ROS production. RLU = Relative luminescence units. The values are the average of triplicates, and the standard deviation is presented.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A549 lung carcinoma cells were exposed to different concentrations of MMF (0.1, 1 µg/mL and 10 µg/mL) and 2.5 ng/mL IL-1β for 24 h. The GM-CSF levels in the supernatant were determined by an ELISA. MMF suppressed the IL-1β-induced GM-CSF production in A549 lung cancer cells. The lowest concentrations of mometasone (0.1–1 µg/mL) caused strong and similar inhibition of GM-CSF production, while the higher concentration of 10 µg/mL MMF had no effect. The values are the average of triplicates, and the standard deviation is presented. * p < 0.05.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A cellular model of inflammation. RAW264.7 macrophages were exposed to different concentrations of MMF (0.1, 1 µg/mL and 10 µg/mL) in the presence of 10 ng/mL LPS for 24 h. The levels of TNFα (A) and IL-6 (B) in the macrophage supernatants were determined by an ELISA. Mometasone suppressed both TNFα and IL-6 secretion from LPS-exposed macrophages. The macrophages produced a low amount of TNFα and IL-6 in the absence of LPS, which was strongly induced in its presence. The lower tested concentrations of MMF (0.1–1 µg/mL) caused stronger inhibition of TNFα than the higher one (10 µg/mL). The values are the average of triplicates, and the standard deviation is presented. * p < 0.05 compared to LPS alone.
Figure 5
Figure 5
A cellular model of inflammation: SRV-MMF and SRV-placebo-coated nasal stents were incubated in 2 mL DMEM for 24 h and daily transferred to a fresh DMEM for 20 days. Then, the RAW 264.7 macrophages were incubated with the supernatant in the presence of LPS (10 ng/mL) for 24 h, and the secreted IL-6 (A), TNFα (B), and IL-10 (C) levels were analyzed by an ELISA. The red line presents the IL-6, IL-10, and TNFα levels secreted by the macrophages in the presence of 10 ng/mL LPS, while the green line presents their levels in the macrophage samples exposed to LPS and 100 ng/mL MMF. The black lines are the SRV-placebo-coated samples of two individual samples, while the blue lines are the SRV-MMF-coated samples of three individual samples. Figure 6A,C shows the IL-6, TNFα, and IL-10 levels, respectively, secreted from the macrophages in the same experiment in the absence or presence of 10 ng/mL LPS and/or MMF. The inhibitory effect of the SRV-MMF-coated stents on the secretion of all three cytokines was statistically significant (p < 0.05), while the SRV-placebo had only a significant inhibition on IL-10 secretion (p < 0.05).
Figure 5
Figure 5
A cellular model of inflammation: SRV-MMF and SRV-placebo-coated nasal stents were incubated in 2 mL DMEM for 24 h and daily transferred to a fresh DMEM for 20 days. Then, the RAW 264.7 macrophages were incubated with the supernatant in the presence of LPS (10 ng/mL) for 24 h, and the secreted IL-6 (A), TNFα (B), and IL-10 (C) levels were analyzed by an ELISA. The red line presents the IL-6, IL-10, and TNFα levels secreted by the macrophages in the presence of 10 ng/mL LPS, while the green line presents their levels in the macrophage samples exposed to LPS and 100 ng/mL MMF. The black lines are the SRV-placebo-coated samples of two individual samples, while the blue lines are the SRV-MMF-coated samples of three individual samples. Figure 6A,C shows the IL-6, TNFα, and IL-10 levels, respectively, secreted from the macrophages in the same experiment in the absence or presence of 10 ng/mL LPS and/or MMF. The inhibitory effect of the SRV-MMF-coated stents on the secretion of all three cytokines was statistically significant (p < 0.05), while the SRV-placebo had only a significant inhibition on IL-10 secretion (p < 0.05).
Figure 6
Figure 6
The control samples of data presented in Figure 5. The same macrophages that were used for measuring the anti-inflammatory action of supernatants that have been exposed to either the SRV-placebo or SRV-MMF-coated SNS were exposed to 10 ng/mL LPS alone or in the presence of 100 ng/mL MMF. The IL-6 (A), TNFα (B), and IL-10 (C) levels were measured simultaneously with the samples in Figure 5 by an ELISA. MMF significantly prevented LPS-induced IL-6 secretion (A) and IL-10 (C), with only limited inhibition of TNFα secretion (B). The values are the average of triplicates, and the standard deviation is presented. * p < 0.05. The IL-6, IL-10, and TNFα levels of untreated (“control”) macrophages are also shown.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albu S. Chronic Rhinosinusitis-An Update on Epidemiology, Pathogenesis and Management. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:2285. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072285. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenfeld R.M., Andes D., Bhattacharyya N., Cheung D., Eisenberg S., Ganiats T.G., Gelzer A., Hamilos D., Haydon R.C., 3rd, Hudgins P.A., et al. Clinical practice guideline: Adult sinusitis. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2007;137:S1–S31. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.10.032. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fokkens W.J., Lund V.J., Hopkins C., Hellings P.W., Kern R., Reitsma S., Toppila-Salmi S., Bernal-Sprekelsen M., Mullol J. Executive summary of EPOS 2020 including integrated care pathways. Rhinology. 2020;58:82–111. doi: 10.4193/Rhin20.601. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ruan J.W., Zhao J.F., Li X.L., Liao B., Pan L., Zhu K.Z., Feng Q.M., Liu J.X., Yu Z.E., Song J., et al. Characterizing the Neutrophilic Inflammation in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9:793073. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.793073. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang Z., Zhou B., Wang D., Zang H., Zhang H., Wang H., Wang S., Cheng L., Li J., Wu W., et al. Comparison of Bioabsorbable Steroid-Eluting Sinus Stents Versus Nasopore After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blinded Clinical Trial. Ear Nose Throat J. 2022;101:260–267. doi: 10.1177/0145561320947632. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources