Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 21;15(6):1560.
doi: 10.3390/polym15061560.

Investigation of Fracturing Fluid Flowback in Hydraulically Fractured Formations Based on Microscopic Visualization Experiments

Affiliations

Investigation of Fracturing Fluid Flowback in Hydraulically Fractured Formations Based on Microscopic Visualization Experiments

Guodong Zou et al. Polymers (Basel). .

Abstract

Fracturing fluids are widely applied in the hydraulic fracturing of shale gas reservoirs, but the fracturing fluid flowback efficiency is typically less than 50%, severely limiting the shale gas recovery. Additionally, the mechanism and main influencing factors of fracturing fluid flowback are unclear. In this study, microscopic experiments are conducted to simulate the fracturing fluid flowback progress in shale gas reservoirs. The mechanism and factors affecting fracturing fluid flowback/retention in the fracture zone were analyzed and clarified. Results show that the ultimate flowback efficiency of fracturing fluid is positively correlated with the fracturing fluid concentration and the gas driving pressure difference. There are four kinds of mechanisms responsible for fracturing fluid retention in the pore network: viscous resistance, the Jamin effect, the gas blockage effect and the dead end of the pore. Additionally, the ultimate flowback efficiency of the fracturing fluid increases linearly with increasing capillary number. These insights will advance the fundamental understanding of fracturing fluid flowback in shale gas reservoirs and provide useful guidance for shale gas reservoirs development.

Keywords: fracturing fluid flowback; hydraulic fracture; microscopic model; polyacrylamide; shale gas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The molecular structure characteristics of polyacrylamide polymer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The structural characteristics of AMPS-AM.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The contact angles of fracturing fluid-nitrogen and glass surface: (a) 0.1 wt% fracturing fluid; (b) 0.8 wt% fracturing fluid; (c) 1.2 wt% fracturing fluid.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Schematic diagram of the microscopic model.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Schematic diagram of experiment.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The fracturing fluid (0.1 wt%) flowback process images and binary images (a) 0.1 MPa gas drive, (b) 0.2 MPa gas drive, (c) 0.3 MPa gas drive.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The fracturing fluid (0.1 wt%) flowback process images and binary images (a) 0.1 MPa gas drive, (b) 0.2 MPa gas drive, (c) 0.3 MPa gas drive.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Relationship between time and flowback efficiency of fracturing fluid (0.1 wt%).
Figure 8
Figure 8
The fracturing fluid (0.8 wt%) flowback process images and binary images (a) 0.1 MPa gas drive, (b) 0.2 MPa gas drive, (c) 0.3 MPa gas drive.
Figure 8
Figure 8
The fracturing fluid (0.8 wt%) flowback process images and binary images (a) 0.1 MPa gas drive, (b) 0.2 MPa gas drive, (c) 0.3 MPa gas drive.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Relationship between time and flowback efficiency of fracturing fluid (0.8 wt%).
Figure 10
Figure 10
The fracturing fluid (1.2 wt%) flowback process images and binary images (a) 0.3 MPa gas drive, (b) 0.4 MPa gas drive, (c) 0.5 MPa gas drive.
Figure 10
Figure 10
The fracturing fluid (1.2 wt%) flowback process images and binary images (a) 0.3 MPa gas drive, (b) 0.4 MPa gas drive, (c) 0.5 MPa gas drive.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Relationship between time and flowback efficiency of fracturing fluid (1.2 wt%).
Figure 12
Figure 12
Four kinds of fracturing fluid retention in the microscopic model, fracturing fluid is in the light area, nitrogen is in the dark area and the residual fracturing fluid is marked by the yellow dashed box. (a) the viscous retention, (b) the Jamin effect, (c) the gas blockage effect, (d) the dead end of the pore.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Binary images of the residual fracturing fluid (1.2 wt%) after flowback (a) 0.3 MPa gas drive, (b) 0.4 MPa gas drive, (c) 0.5 MPa gas drive.
Figure 14
Figure 14
cryo-SEM images of fracturing fluid (a) 0.1 wt%, (b) 0.8 wt%, (c) 1.2 wt%.
Figure 15
Figure 15
Binary images of the residual fracturing fluid after 0.3 MPa gas drive (a) 0.1 wt%, (b) 0.8 wt%, (c) 1.2 wt%.
Figure 16
Figure 16
The ultimate flowback efficiencies for nine experimental groups.
Figure 17
Figure 17
Relationship between the ultimate flowback efficiency of fracturing fluid and capillary number.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhao X., Kang B., Lan B. Focus on the development of shale gas in China—Based on SWOT analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013;21:603–613. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.044. - DOI
    1. National Energy Administration Shale Gas Development Planning (2016–2020) [(accessed on 14 September 2016)]; Available online: http://zfxxgk.nea.gov.cn/auto86/201609/t20160930_2306.htm?keywords.
    1. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Shale Gas Production Drives World Natural Gas Production Growth. [(accessed on 15 August 2016)]; Available online: https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=27512.
    1. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Annual Energy Outlook 2016 with Projections to 2040. [(accessed on 20 March 2016)]; Available online: www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383(2016).pdf.
    1. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Argentina Seeking Increased Natural Gas Production from Shale Resources to Reduce Imports. [(accessed on 10 February 2017)]; Available online: https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=29912.

LinkOut - more resources