The impact of antihypertensive treatment of mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- PMID: 36987390
- PMCID: PMC10189071
- DOI: 10.1002/clc.24013
The impact of antihypertensive treatment of mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Currently, there is controversy regarding the treatment of pregnant patients with mild hypertension (blood pressure 140-159/90-109 mm Hg). While guidelines do not recommend this treatment, results from recent clinical trials are supportive of the treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify if active treatment of mild hypertension during pregnancy results in better maternal and fetal outcomes. All of the potentially eligible randomized controlled trials were retrieved through a systematic database search investigating the impact of pharmacological treatment in mild hypertensive patients on maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Data from 12 trials comprising 4461 pregnant women diagnosed with mild to moderate hypertension (2395 in the intervention group and 2066 in the control group) were extracted for quantitative synthesis. Antihypertensive treatment was associated with better outcomes in seven out of the 19 analyzed outcomes: Severe hypertension (RR = 0.53; 95% CI = [0.38;0.75]), preeclampsia (RR = 0.71; 95% CI = [0.54; 0.93]), placental abruption (RR = 0.48; 95% CI = [0.26; 0.87]), changes in electrocardiogram (RR = 0.43; 95% CI = [0.25; 0.72]), renal impairment (RR = 0.42; 95% CI = [0.34; 0.51]), pulmonary edema (RR = 0.46; 95% CI = [0.25; 0.84]), and neonatal mortality (RR = 0.72; 95% CI = [0.57; 0.92]). The primary safety outcome of small for gestational age was not different between the treatment group and the control group (RR = 1.12; 95% CI = [0.80; 1.57]). The results of this meta-analysis are in favor of the beneficial impact of pharmacological treatment of mild hypertension on both maternal and neonatal outcomes and without significant adverse events for the fetus.
Keywords: antihypertensive treatment; chronic hypertension; fetal outcomes; gestational hypertension; maternal outcomes.
© 2023 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures




References
-
- Li F, Wang T, Chen L, Zhang S, Chen L, Qin J. Adverse pregnancy outcomes among mothers with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: a meta‐analysis of cohort studies. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2021;24:107‐117. - PubMed
-
- Battarbee AN, Sinkey RG, Harper LM, Oparil S, Tita ATN. Chronic hypertension in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(6):532‐541. - PubMed
-
- Ukah UV, De Silva DA, Payne B, et al. Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes from pre‐eclampsia and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018;11:115‐123. - PubMed
-
- Magee LA, von Dadelszen P. State‐of‐the‐art diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in pregnancy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018;93(11):1664‐1677. - PubMed
-
- Magee LA, von Dadelszen P, Rey E, et al. Less‐tight versus tight control of hypertension in pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(5):407‐417. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical