Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May;46(5):467-476.
doi: 10.1002/clc.24013. Epub 2023 Mar 28.

The impact of antihypertensive treatment of mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations
Review

The impact of antihypertensive treatment of mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Armin Attar et al. Clin Cardiol. 2023 May.

Abstract

Currently, there is controversy regarding the treatment of pregnant patients with mild hypertension (blood pressure 140-159/90-109 mm Hg). While guidelines do not recommend this treatment, results from recent clinical trials are supportive of the treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify if active treatment of mild hypertension during pregnancy results in better maternal and fetal outcomes. All of the potentially eligible randomized controlled trials were retrieved through a systematic database search investigating the impact of pharmacological treatment in mild hypertensive patients on maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Data from 12 trials comprising 4461 pregnant women diagnosed with mild to moderate hypertension (2395 in the intervention group and 2066 in the control group) were extracted for quantitative synthesis. Antihypertensive treatment was associated with better outcomes in seven out of the 19 analyzed outcomes: Severe hypertension (RR = 0.53; 95% CI = [0.38;0.75]), preeclampsia (RR = 0.71; 95% CI = [0.54; 0.93]), placental abruption (RR = 0.48; 95% CI = [0.26; 0.87]), changes in electrocardiogram (RR = 0.43; 95% CI = [0.25; 0.72]), renal impairment (RR = 0.42; 95% CI = [0.34; 0.51]), pulmonary edema (RR = 0.46; 95% CI = [0.25; 0.84]), and neonatal mortality (RR = 0.72; 95% CI = [0.57; 0.92]). The primary safety outcome of small for gestational age was not different between the treatment group and the control group (RR = 1.12; 95% CI = [0.80; 1.57]). The results of this meta-analysis are in favor of the beneficial impact of pharmacological treatment of mild hypertension on both maternal and neonatal outcomes and without significant adverse events for the fetus.

Keywords: antihypertensive treatment; chronic hypertension; fetal outcomes; gestational hypertension; maternal outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart of the process of study inclusion. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis; RCT, randomized controlled trials.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pooled treatment effect estimates of antihypertensive treatment in mild hypertension on pregnancy outcomes. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; ECG, electrocardiogram; IUFD, intrauterine fetal demise; LBW, low birth weight; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; RR, relative risk; SGA, small for gestational age; VTE, venous thromboembolism.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot displaying the impact of antihypertensive medications in mild hypertension during pregnancy on (A) severe hypertension, (B) preeclampsia, (C) renal impairment, (D) placental abruption, (E) pulmonary edema, and (F) ECG change based on the type of hypertension included in each trial. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; ECG, electrocardiogram; MH, Mantel–Haenszel.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot displaying the impact of antihypertensive medications in mild hypertension during pregnancy on small for gestational age (SGA) based on the type of hypertension included in each trial. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; MH, Mantel–Haenszel.

References

    1. Li F, Wang T, Chen L, Zhang S, Chen L, Qin J. Adverse pregnancy outcomes among mothers with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: a meta‐analysis of cohort studies. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2021;24:107‐117. - PubMed
    1. Battarbee AN, Sinkey RG, Harper LM, Oparil S, Tita ATN. Chronic hypertension in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(6):532‐541. - PubMed
    1. Ukah UV, De Silva DA, Payne B, et al. Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes from pre‐eclampsia and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018;11:115‐123. - PubMed
    1. Magee LA, von Dadelszen P. State‐of‐the‐art diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in pregnancy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018;93(11):1664‐1677. - PubMed
    1. Magee LA, von Dadelszen P, Rey E, et al. Less‐tight versus tight control of hypertension in pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(5):407‐417. - PubMed

Substances