Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Sep 1;78(3):835-846.
doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000363. Epub 2023 Mar 30.

Acute rejection after liver transplantation with machine perfusion versus static cold storage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Acute rejection after liver transplantation with machine perfusion versus static cold storage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Marianna Maspero et al. Hepatology. .

Abstract

Background and aims: Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a frequent complication after liver transplantation. By reducing ischemia and graft damage, dynamic preservation techniques may diminish ACR. We performed a systematic review to assess the effect of currently tested organ perfusion (OP) approaches versus static cold storage (SCS) on post-transplant ACR-rates.

Approach and results: A systematic search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted. Studies reporting ACR-rates between OP and SCS and comprising at least 10 liver transplants performed with either hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE), normothermic machine perfusion, or normothermic regional perfusion were included. Studies with mixed perfusion approaches were excluded. Eight studies were identified (226 patients in OP and 330 in SCS). Six studies were on HOPE, one on normothermic machine perfusion, and one on normothermic regional perfusion. At meta-analysis, OP was associated with a reduction in ACR compared with SCS [OR: 0.55 (95% CI, 0.33-0.91), p =0.02]. This effect remained significant when considering HOPE alone [OR: 0.54 (95% CI, 0.29-1), p =0.05], in a subgroup analysis of studies including only grafts from donation after cardiac death [OR: 0.43 (0.20-0.91) p =0.03], and in HOPE studies with only donation after cardiac death grafts [OR: 0.37 (0.14-1), p =0.05].

Conclusions: Dynamic OP techniques are associated with a reduction in ACR after liver transplantation compared with SCS. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022348356.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Rodríguez-Perálvarez M, Rico-Juri JM, Tsochatzis E, Burra P, De la Mata M, Lerut J. Biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection as an efficacy endpoint of randomized trials in liver transplantation: a systematic review and critical appraisal. Transpl Int Off J Eur Soc Organ Transplant. 2016;29:961–73.
    1. Cillo U, Bechstein WO, Berlakovich G, Dutkowski P, Lehner F, Nadalin S, et al. Identifying risk profiles in liver transplant candidates and implications for induction immunosuppression. Transplant Rev. 2018;32:142–50.
    1. Levitsky J, Goldberg D, Smith AR, Mansfield SA, Gillespie BW, Merion RM, et al. Acute rejection increases risk of graft failure and death in recent liver transplant recipients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2017;15:584–93.e2.
    1. Land WG. Emerging role of innate immunity in organ transplantation: part I: evolution of innate immunity and oxidative allograft injury. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2012;26:60–72.
    1. Bhatti ABH, Jafri RZ, Sahaab E, Dar FS, Zia HH, Khan NY. Long term outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single center experience from Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc [Internet]. 2021;71:1838–42.