Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 May 1;80(5):432-440.
doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.0131.

Association Between the Fronto-Limbic Network and Cognitive and Emotional Functioning in Individuals With Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Association Between the Fronto-Limbic Network and Cognitive and Emotional Functioning in Individuals With Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Rahele Mesbah et al. JAMA Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Importance: Individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) experience cognitive and emotional dysfunctions. Various brain circuits are implicated in BD but have not been investigated in a meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies.

Objective: To investigate the brain functioning of individuals with BD compared with healthy control individuals in the domains of emotion processing, reward processing, and working memory.

Data sources: All fMRI experiments on BD published before March 2020, as identified in a literature search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PsycInfo, Emcare, Academic Search Premier, and ScienceDirect. The literature search was conducted on February 21, 2017, and March 2, 2020, and data were analyzed from January 2021 to January 2022.

Study selection: fMRI experiments comparing adult individuals with BD and healthy control individuals were selected if they reported whole-brain results, including a task assessing at least 1 of the domains. In total, 2320 studies were screened, and 253 full-text articles were evaluated.

Data extraction and synthesis: A total of 49 studies were included after selection procedure. Coordinates reporting significant activation differences between individuals with BD and healthy control individuals were extracted. Differences in brain region activity were tested using the activation likelihood estimation method.

Main outcomes and measures: A whole-brain meta-analysis evaluated whether reported differences in brain activation in response to stimuli in 3 cognitive domains between individuals with BD and healthy control individuals were different.

Results: The study population included 999 individuals with BD (551 [55.2%] female) and 1027 healthy control individuals (532 [51.8%] female). Compared with healthy control individuals, individuals with BD showed amygdala and hippocampal hyperactivity and hypoactivation in the inferior frontal gyrus during emotion processing (20 studies; 324 individuals with BD and 369 healthy control individuals), hyperactivation in the orbitofrontal cortex during reward processing (9 studies; 195 individuals with BD and 213 healthy control individuals), and hyperactivation in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and subgenual anterior cingulate cortex during working memory (20 studies; 530 individuals with BD and 417 healthy control individuals). Limbic hyperactivation was only found during euthymia in the emotion and reward processing domains; abnormalities in frontal cortex activity were also found in individuals with BD with mania and depression.

Conclusions and relevance: This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed evidence for activity disturbances in key brain areas involved in cognitive and emotion processing in individuals with BD. Most of the regions are part of the fronto-limbic network. The results suggest that aberrations in the fronto-limbic network, present in both euthymic and symptomatic individuals, may be underlying cognitive and emotional dysfunctions in BD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Meta-analytic Maps of Brain Functional Changes in the Emotion Processing Domain
Red circles show area of hyperactivation. BD indicates bipolar disorder; HC, healthy control.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Meta-analytic Maps of Brain Functional Changes in the Reward Processing Domain
Hyperactivation in the left orbitofrontal cortex in individuals with bipolar disorder compared with healthy control individuals.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Meta-analytic Maps of Brain Functional Changes in the Working Memory Domain
Hyperactivation in the left subgenual anterior cingulate (blue circles) and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (red circles) in individuals with bipolar disorder compared with healthy control individuals.

References

    1. Judd LL, Akiskal HS, Schettler PJ, et al. . The comparative clinical phenotype and long term longitudinal episode course of bipolar I and II: a clinical spectrum or distinct disorders? J Affect Disord. 2003;73(1-2):19-32. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00324-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grande I, Berk M, Birmaher B, Vieta E. Bipolar disorder. Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1561-1572. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00241-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martínez-Arán A, Vieta E, Colom F, et al. . Cognitive impairment in euthymic bipolar patients: implications for clinical and functional outcome. Bipolar Disord. 2004;6(3):224-232. doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2004.00111.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bora E, Yucel M, Pantelis C. Cognitive endophenotypes of bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis of neuropsychological deficits in euthymic patients and their first-degree relatives. J Affect Disord. 2009;113(1-2):1-20. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robinson LJ, Thompson JM, Gallagher P, et al. . A meta-analysis of cognitive deficits in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2006;93(1-3):105-115. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2006.02.016 - DOI - PubMed