COVID-19 (Omicron strain) hospital admissions from a virtual ward - who required further care?
- PMID: 36991540
- PMCID: PMC10040950
- DOI: 10.1111/irv.13108
COVID-19 (Omicron strain) hospital admissions from a virtual ward - who required further care?
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 virtual ward was created to provide care for people at home with COVID-19. Given this was a new model of care, little was known about the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients requiring admission to hospital from the virtual ward platform. The aims were to characterise hospital admission volume, patient epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcome from a virtual ward in the setting of an Omicron (BA.1, BA.2) outbreak.
Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed for all virtual ward patients admitted from 1st January 2022 to 25th March 2022 (over 16 years old). Epidemiological, clinical and laboratory data was reviewed on all patients who required hospital admission.
Results: A total of 7021 patients were cared for on the virtual ward over the study period with 473 referred to hospital for assessment. Twenty-six (0.4%) patients were admitted to hospital during their care on the ward. Twenty-two (84.6%) admissions were COVID-19 related. Fifty three percent of the hospitalised patients were fully vaccinated and 11 had received prior therapeutics for COVID-19. Shortness of breath was the most common reason for escalation to hospital. Chest pain was the second most common reason and the most common diagnosis after investigation was non-cardiac chest pain.
Conclusions: Few patients required admission from the virtual ward in the setting of the Omicron variant (BA.1, BA.2) as a direct result of COVID-19 disease and virtual ward care. Shortness of breath and chest pain were the most common symptoms driving further clinical care.
Keywords: COVID-19; Omicron; hospital admissions; virtual care.
© 2023 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
-
- McCarthy KL, James DP, Kumar N, et al. Infection control behaviours, intra‐household transmission and quarantine duration: a retrospective cohort analysis of COVID‐19 cases. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2022. August 18 [cited 2022 August 21];46(6):730‐734. doi:10.1111/1753-6405.13282 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Australian National COVID‐19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce . Australian guidelines for the clinical care of people with COVID‐19 [Internet]. Melbourne: Australian National COVID‐19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce; 2022. July 13 [cited 2022 July 13]. Available from: https://files.magicapp.org/guideline/704d9d02-09d7-4a31-b9ef-2aa93f4d1fd...
-
- ISARIC Clinical Characterisation Group . COVID‐19 symptoms at hospital admission vary with age and sex: ISARIC multinational study. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2020 November 19 [cited 2022 July 13]. doi:10.1101/2020.10.26.20219519. Update in: Infection. 2021. Oct;49(5):889–905. PMID: 33140062; PMCID: PMC7605573. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7605573/ - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- O'Malley EJ, Hansjee S, Abdel‐Hadi B, Kendrick E, Lok S. A Covid −19 Virtual Ward Model: A Preliminary Retrospective Clinical Evaluation From a UK District General Hospital. J Prim Care Community Health 2022. January 5 [cited 2022 July 13];13;21501319211066667. doi:10.1177/21501319211066667 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Thornton J. The “virtual wards” supporting patients with covid‐19 in the community. BMJ 2020. June 5 [cited 2022 July 19];369;m2119. 10.1136/bmj.m2119. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/369/bmj.m2119.full.pdf - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical