Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Mar 8;23(6):2927.
doi: 10.3390/s23062927.

Reducing Noise, Artifacts and Interference in Single-Channel EMG Signals: A Review

Marianne Boyer  1   2 , Laurent Bouyer  2   3 , Jean-Sébastien Roy  2   3 , Alexandre Campeau-Lecours  1   2
Affiliations
Review

Reducing Noise, Artifacts and Interference in Single-Channel EMG Signals: A Review

Marianne Boyer et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Electromyography (EMG) is gaining importance in many research and clinical applications, including muscle fatigue detection, control of robotic mechanisms and prostheses, clinical diagnosis of neuromuscular diseases and quantification of force. However, EMG signals can be contaminated by various types of noise, interference and artifacts, leading to potential data misinterpretation. Even assuming best practices, the acquired signal may still contain contaminants. The aim of this paper is to review methods employed to reduce the contamination of single channel EMG signals. Specifically, we focus on methods which enable a full reconstruction of the EMG signal without loss of information. This includes subtraction methods used in the time domain, denoising methods performed after the signal decomposition and hybrid approaches that combine multiple methods. Finally, this paper provides a discussion on the suitability of the individual methods based on the type of contaminant(s) present in the signal and the specific requirements of the application.

Keywords: artifact; contaminant reduction; denoising; electromyography; filtering; interference; noise; signal processing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Power spectrum of the EMG signal (A) and of some of its contaminants: power line interference (B), motion artifact (C), electrocardiographic signal (D) and baseline noise (E).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Baseline noise power spectrum.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Principle of the subtraction methods in the time domain.
Figure 4
Figure 4
General block diagram of an interference reduction method using an adaptive estimation of the interference signal by means of filtering the raw signal.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Block diagram of the classic adaptive noise canceller.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Block diagram of the adaptive noise canceller along with the measured signal composition.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Block diagram of the decomposition methods.
Figure 8
Figure 8
General scheme of the method proposed by [17] to remove background noise from the EMG signal: 1. Estimation of the power spectrum coefficients of the Background noise by performing a fast Fourier transform (FFT) on the noisy signal (the electrode is placed on the skin, but the muscle is not contracted), 2. Estimation of the power spectrum coefficients of the measured signal during contraction using the FFT, 3. Subtraction of the noise coefficients from the measured coefficients and 4. Reconstruction of the signal using the inverse Fourier Transform.
Figure 9
Figure 9
(A) Filter bank resulting from a a DWT at level 3 of decomposition and (B) the resulting coefficients of the DWT. The coefficients/components used in the DWT are presented in grey.
Figure 10
Figure 10
(A) Resulting filter bank of a WPT at level 3 of decomposition along with (B) resulting coefficients of the WPT. The coefficients/components used in WPT are presented in grey.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Output coefficient obtained according to the input coefficient for HAD (left) and SOF (right) functions.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Block diagram of Wavelet-ICA.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Block diagram of adaptive filtering using wavelet transform on the raw signal to estimate the interference.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Chan B., Saad I., Bolong N., Siew K.E. A Review of Surface EMG in Clinical Rehabilitation Care Systems Design; Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 19th Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD); Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia. 23–25 November 2021; pp. 371–376. - DOI
    1. Rozaqi L., Nugroho A., Sanjaya K.H., Simbolon A.I. Design of Analog and Digital Filter of Electromyography; Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Sustainable Energy Engineering and Application (ICSEEA); Serpong, Indonesia. 23–24 October 2019; New York, NY, USA: IEEE; pp. 186–192. - DOI
    1. Corvini G., D’Anna C., Conforto S. Estimation of mean and median frequency from synthetic sEMG signals: Effects of different spectral shapes and noise on estimation methods. Biomed. Signal Process. Control. 2022;73:103420. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103420. - DOI
    1. Liu J., Zhang D., Sheng X., Zhu X. Quantification and solutions of arm movements effect on sEMG pattern recognition. Biomed. Signal Process. Control. 2014;13:189–197. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2014.05.001. - DOI
    1. Maier J., Naber A., Ortiz-Catalan M. Improved Prosthetic Control Based on Myoelectric Pattern Recognition via Wavelet-Based De-Noising. IEEE Trans. Neural. Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2018;26:506–514. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2771273. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources