Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 1;278(2):230-238.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005849. Epub 2023 Mar 30.

The Impact of a Liver Transplant Program on the Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Yutaka Endo  1 , Kazunari Sasaki  2 , Zorays Moazzam  1 , Selamawit Woldesenbet  1 , Jason Yang  1 , Henrique Araujo Lima  1 , Laura Alaimo  1 , Muhammad Musaab Munir  1 , Chanza F Shaikh  1 , Austin Schenk  1 , Minoru Kitago  3 , Timothy M Pawlik  1
Affiliations

The Impact of a Liver Transplant Program on the Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Yutaka Endo et al. Ann Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: We sought to evaluate the impact of liver transplantation (LT) programs on the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent liver resection (LR) and noncurative intent treatment.

Background: LT programs have an array of resources and services that would positively affect the prognosis of patients with HCC.

Methods: Patients who underwent LT, LR, radiotherapy (RT), or chemotherapy (CTx) for HCC between 2004 and 2018 were included in the National Cancer Database. Institutions with LT programs were defined as those that performed 1 or more LT for at least 5 years. Centers were stratified by hospital volume. The impact of LT programs was assessed after propensity score matching to achieve covariate balance.

Results: A total of 71,735 patients were identified, of which 7997 received LT (11.1%), 12,683 LR (17.7%), 15,675 RT (21.9%), and 35,380 CTx (49.3%). Among a total of 1267 distinct institutions, 94 (7.4%) were categorized as LT programs. Designation as an LT program was also associated with a high volume of LR and noncurative intent treatment (both P <0.001). After propensity score matching, LT programs were associated with better survival among LR and noncurative intent treatment patients. Although hospital volume was also associated with improved prognosis, LT programs were associated with additional survival benefits in noncurative intent treatment. On the other hand, no such benefit was noted in patients who underwent LR.

Conclusions: The presence of an LT program was associated with a higher volume of LR and noncurative intent treatment. Furthermore, designation as an LT program had a "halo effect" on the prognosis of patients undergoing RT/CTx that went beyond the procedure-volume effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.
    1. Reig M, Forner A, Rimola J, et al. BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: the 2022 update. J Hepatol. 2022;76:681–693.
    1. Kalogeridi MA, Zygogianni A, Kyrgias G, et al. Role of radiotherapy in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. World J Hepatol. 2015;7:101–112.
    1. Uhlig J, Sellers CM, Khan SA, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Impact of academic setting and hospital volume on patient survival. Surg Oncol. 2019;31:111–118.
    1. Ohira M, Tanimine N, Kobayashi T, et al. Essential updates 2018/2019: Liver transplantation. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020;4:195–207.