Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;20(3):373-389.
doi: 10.1007/s10388-023-00994-1. Epub 2023 Mar 30.

Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2022 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society: part 2

Yuko Kitagawa  1 , Ryu Ishihara  2 , Hitoshi Ishikawa  3 , Yoshinori Ito  4 , Takashi Oyama  5 , Tsuneo Oyama  6 , Ken Kato  7 , Hiroyuki Kato  8 , Hirofumi Kawakubo  9 , Hiroshi Kawachi  10 , Shiko Kuribayashi  11 , Koji Kono  12 , Takashi Kojima  13 , Hiroya Takeuchi  14 , Takahiro Tsushima  15 , Yasushi Toh  16 , Kenji Nemoto  17 , Eisuke Booka  14 , Tomoki Makino  18 , Satoru Matsuda  9 , Hisahiro Matsubara  19 , Masayuki Mano  20 , Keiko Minashi  21 , Tatsuya Miyazaki  22 , Manabu Muto  23 , Taiki Yamaji  24 , Tomoki Yamatsuji  25 , Masahiro Yoshida  26
Affiliations

Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2022 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society: part 2

Yuko Kitagawa et al. Esophagus. 2023 Jul.
No abstract available

Keywords: Cancer; Esophagus; Practice guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Funds to support the development of these guidelines were provided by the Japan Esophageal Society. Members of the Guideline Review Committee and Guideline Steering Committee personally reported their conflicts of interests in conformity with the regulations of the Japan Esophageal Society. The Ethics Committee and the Board of Directors of the Japan Esophageal Society confirmed the personally reported conflict-of-interest situations. Situations of conflicts of interests are uploaded on the website of the Japan Esophageal Society for each fiscal year.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Algorithm for surgical approach to adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and lymph node dissection (modified from Kurokawa et al.: Ann Surg. 2021; 274(1): 120–127, Fig. 3)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mayanagi S, Onitsuka T, Nakagawa M, et al. The use of short segment free jejunal transfer as salvage surgery for cervical esophageal and hypopharyngeal cancer. World J Surg. 2014;38(1):144–149. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2229-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ullah R, Bailie N, Kinsella J, et al. Pharyngo-laryngo-oesophagectomy and gastric pull-up for post-cricoid and cervical oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Laryngol Otol. 2002;116(10):826–830. doi: 10.1258/00222150260293655. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, et al. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(2):152–162. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805101. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9829):1887–1892. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME trial. Ann Surg. 2017;266(2):232–236. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002171. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types