Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate versus posterior screw fixation after traumatic subaxial fractures in octogenarians: complications and outcomes with a 2-year follow-up
- PMID: 36997809
- PMCID: PMC10140073
- DOI: 10.1007/s00701-023-05566-x
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate versus posterior screw fixation after traumatic subaxial fractures in octogenarians: complications and outcomes with a 2-year follow-up
Abstract
Introduction: Surgical intervention for management of spinal instability after traumatic subaxial fractures in octogenarians requires a clear consensus on optimal treatments. This study aimed to provide a guide for more efficient management through comparison and assessment of clinical outcomes and complications of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate (pACDF) and posterior decompression fusion (PDF) instrumentation alone in patients aged 80 years.
Methods: A single institution retrospective review of electronic medical records was undertaken between September 2005 and December 2021. Comorbidities were assessed using the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Logistic regression was used to identify potential risk factors for ACDF complications.
Results: The rate of comorbidities were similarly high between the pACDF (n=13) and PDF (n=15) groups (pACDF: 8.7 ± 2.4 points vs. 8.5 ± 2.3 points; p=0.555). Patients in the PDF group had significantly longer surgical duration (235 ± 58.4 min vs. 182.5 ± 32.1 min; p<0.001) and significantly higher volumes of intraoperative blood loss (661.5 ± 100.1 mL vs. 487.5 ± 92.1 mL; p<0.001). The in-hospital mortality was 7.7% for the pACDF group and 6.7% for the PDF group. On day 90, the mortality rate increased in both groups from baseline (pACDF: 15.4% vs. PDF: 13.3; p>0.05). Motor scores (MS) improved significantly after surgery in both groups (pACDF: preOP MS: 75.3 ± 11.1 vs. postOP MS: 82.4 ± 10.1; p<0.05; PDF: preOP MS: 80.7 ± 16.7 vs. postOP MS: 89.5 ± 12.1; p<0.05). Statistically significant predictors for postoperative complications included longer operative times (odds ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.1; p=0.005) and larger volume of blood loss (odds ratio 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.2-2.2; p=0.003).
Conclusions: Both pACDF and PDF can be considered safe treatment strategies for octogenarians with a poor baseline profile and subaxial fractures as they lead to patients substantial neurological improvements, and they are accompanied with low morbidity and mortality rates. Operation duration and intraoperative blood loss should be minimized to increase the degree of neurological recovery in octogenarian patients.
Keywords: ACDF; Instrumentation; Octogenarians; Subaxial fractures.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors delare no competing interests.
Figures


Similar articles
-
ACDF versus corpectomy in octogenarians with cervical epidural abscess: early complications and outcomes with 2 years of follow-up.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Apr;165(4):875-882. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05488-8. Epub 2023 Jan 11. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023. PMID: 36629954 Free PMC article.
-
Pediatric cervical kyphosis in the MRI era (1984-2008) with long-term follow up: literature review.Childs Nerv Syst. 2022 Feb;38(2):361-377. doi: 10.1007/s00381-021-05409-z. Epub 2021 Nov 22. Childs Nerv Syst. 2022. PMID: 34806157 Review.
-
Comparison between repeat anterior and posterior decompression and fusion in the treatment of two-level symptomatic adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical arthrodesis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Aug 8;15(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01834-z. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020. PMID: 32771006 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of failure after primary anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for subaxial traumatic spine injuries.Eur Spine J. 2024 Jun;33(6):2332-2339. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08264-z. Epub 2024 Apr 25. Eur Spine J. 2024. PMID: 38664273
-
Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Sep 15;29(18):2040-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000138268.12324.1a. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004. PMID: 15371706 Review.
Cited by
-
Surgery for subaxial cervical spine injuries: which is better: anterior, posterior, or anterior-posterior combined approach?: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Asian Spine J. 2024 Aug;18(4):594-607. doi: 10.31616/asj.2023.0266. Epub 2024 Aug 21. Asian Spine J. 2024. PMID: 39165063 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Aarabi B, Mirvis S, Shanmuganathan K, Vaccaro AR, Holmes CJ, Akhtar-Danesh N, Fehlings MG, Dvorak MF. Comparative effectiveness of surgical versus nonoperative management of unilateral, nondisplaced, subaxial cervical spine facet fractures without evidence of spinal cord injury: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20(3):270–277. doi: 10.3171/2013.11.SPINE13733. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ageing and health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health. Accessed 13 Mar 2022
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical