Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 30;23(1):305.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09283-0.

Prevention of invasive ventilation (PRiVENT)-a prospective, mixed-methods interventional, multicentre study with a parallel comparison group: study protocol

Collaborators, Affiliations

Prevention of invasive ventilation (PRiVENT)-a prospective, mixed-methods interventional, multicentre study with a parallel comparison group: study protocol

Julia D Michels et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is a standard therapy for intensive care patients with respiratory failure. With increasing population age and multimorbidity, the number of patients who cannot be weaned from IMV increases, resulting in impaired quality of life and high costs. In addition, human resources are tied up in the care of these patients.

Methods: The PRiVENT intervention is a prospective, mixed-methods interventional, multicentre study with a parallel comparison group selected from insurance claims data of the health insurer Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse Baden-Württemberg (AOK-BW) conducted in Baden-Württemberg, Germany, over 24 months. Four weaning centres supervise 40 intensive care units (ICUs), that are responsible for patient recruitment. The primary outcome, successful weaning from IMV, will be evaluated using a mixed logistic regression model. Secondary outcomes will be evaluated using mixed regression models.

Discussion: The overall objective of the PRiVENT project is the evaluation of strategies to prevent long-term IMV. Additional objectives aim to improve weaning expertise in and cooperation with the adjacent Intensive Care Units.

Trial registration: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05260853).

Keywords: Invasive mechanical ventilation; Medical education and training; Respiratory failure; Weaning; Weaning failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Joachim Szecsenyi holds stock of the aQua Institut. Other authors declare none.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Logic Model of the PRiVENT intervention

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kontis V, et al. Future life expectancy in 35 industrialised countries: projections with a Bayesian model ensemble. Lancet. 2017;389(10076):1323–1335. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32381-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McConville JF, Kress JP. Weaning patients from the ventilator. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(23):2233–2239. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1203367. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baptistella AR, et al. Predictive factors of weaning from mechanical ventilation and extubation outcome: a systematic review. J Crit Care. 2018;48:56–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.08.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goligher E, Ferguson ND. Mechanical ventilation: epidemiological insights into current practices. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009;15(1):44–51. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283220df2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boles JM, et al. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J. 2007;29(5):1033–1056. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00010206. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data