Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 28;50(2):153-155.
doi: 10.1055/a-2006-0747. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Encountering Peritoneo-Cutaneous Perforators in Microsurgical DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

Affiliations

Encountering Peritoneo-Cutaneous Perforators in Microsurgical DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

Duncan Loi et al. Arch Plast Surg. .

Abstract

The vascular anatomy of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap has been well studied in the planning for autologous breast reconstruction. Preoperative imaging with computed tomography angiography (CTA) provides accurate assessment of this vascular anatomy, which varies widely across patients. Several papers to date have described their encounter with an anomalous "epiperitoneal" or "peritoneo-cutaneous" perforator during flap harvest, a perforator that pierces the posterior rectus sheath from a peritoneal origin, to traverse rectus abdominis and supply the DIEP flap integument. In the course of over 3,000 CTA assessments of the vascular anatomy of the abdominal wall, we have encountered dominant peritoneo-cutaneous perforators in 1% of cases, and smaller perforators seen in many more cases, approaching 5% of cases. With increasing sensitivity of imaging, we also describe a unique case of multiple large bilateral peritoneo-cutaneous perforators, and present these findings in the context of DIEP flap harvest. It is critical to recognize these peritoneo-cutaneous perforators preoperatively to avoid mistaking them for a DIEP during the raising of a DIEP flap. The routine use of preoperative CTA enables the safe identification of individual vascular anatomy, including significant peritoneo-cutaneous perforators.

Keywords: anatomy; breast reconstruction; microsurgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Computed tomographic angiogram (CTA) axial slices demonstrating a peritoneo-cutaneous perforator (blue arrows).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Intraoperative photograph demonstrating three large peritoneo-cutaneous perforators, all over 1 mm in diameter.

References

    1. Ireton J E, Lakhiani C, Saint-Cyr M. Vascular anatomy of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(05):810e–821e. - PubMed
    1. Ohkuma R, Mohan R, Baltodano P A. Abdominally based free flap planning in breast reconstruction with computed tomographic angiography: systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(03):483–494. - PubMed
    1. Rozen W M, Anavekar N S, Ashton M W. Does the preoperative imaging of perforators with CT angiography improve operative outcomes in breast reconstruction? Microsurgery. 2008;28(07):516–523. - PubMed
    1. Lasso J M, Sancho M, Campo V, Jiménez E, Pérez Cano R. Epiperitoneal vessels: more resources to perform DIEP flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61(07):826–829. - PubMed
    1. Taek Jong L, Sung Chan K, Jin Sup E. Atypical patterns of deep inferior epigastric artery: clinical implication of preoperative CT angiography. J Korean Soc Microsurg. 2012;21(01):8–13.