Identifying opportunities for upstream evaluations relevant to child and maternal health: a UK policy-mapping review
- PMID: 37001969
- PMCID: PMC10314013
- DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2022-325219
Identifying opportunities for upstream evaluations relevant to child and maternal health: a UK policy-mapping review
Abstract
Objective: Interventions to tackle the social determinants of health can improve outcomes during pregnancy and early childhood, leading to better health across the life course. Variation in content, timing and implementation of policies across the 4 UK nations allows for evaluation. We conducted a policy-mapping review (1981-2021) to identify relevant UK early years policies across the social determinants of health framework, and determine suitable candidates for evaluation using administrative data.
Methods: We used open keyword and category searches of UK and devolved Government websites, and hand searched policy reviews. Policies were rated and included using five criteria: (1) Potential for policy to affect maternal and child health outcomes; (2) Implementation variation across the UK; (3) Population reach and expected effect size; (4) Ability to identify exposed/eligible group in administrative data; (5) Potential to affect health inequalities. An expert consensus workshop determined a final shortlist.
Results: 336 policies and 306 strategy documents were identified. Policies were mainly excluded due to criteria 2-4, leaving 88. The consensus workshop identified three policy areas as suitable candidates for natural experiment evaluation using administrative data: pregnancy grants, early years education and childcare, and Universal Credit.
Conclusion: Our comprehensive policy review identifies valuable opportunities to evaluate sociostructural impacts on mother and child outcomes. However, many potentially impactful policies were excluded. This may lead to the inverse evidence law, where there is least evidence for policies believed to be most effective. This could be ameliorated by better access to administrative data, staged implementation of future policies or alternative evaluation methods.
Keywords: child development; child health.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- HM Treasury . Every child matters. UK Government, 2003. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa...
-
- Scottish Government . Getting it right for every child. Edinburgh: Scottish Government, 2007.
-
- Office of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister . Our children and young people - our pledge: a ten year strategy for children and young people in Northern Ireland 2006. 2003. Available: https://www.health-ni.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/dhssps/chi...
-
- Northern Ireland Executive . Children and young people’s strategy 2020-2030. 2020. Available: https://www.education-ni.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/educati...
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources