Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 31;21(1):28.
doi: 10.1186/s12960-023-00810-y.

Critical care pharmacy workforce: a 2020 re-evaluation of the UK deployment and characteristics

Affiliations

Critical care pharmacy workforce: a 2020 re-evaluation of the UK deployment and characteristics

Mark Borthwick et al. Hum Resour Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Critical care pharmacists improve the quality and efficiency of medication therapy whilst reducing treatment costs where they are available. UK critical care pharmacist deployment was described in 2015, highlighting a deficit in numbers, experience level, and critical care access to pharmacy services over the 7-day week. Since then, national workforce standards have been emphasised, quality indicators published, and service commissioning documents produced, reinforced by care quality assessments. Whether these initiatives have resulted in further development of the UK critical care pharmacy workforce is unknown. This evaluation provides a 2020 status update.

Methods: The 2015 electronic data entry tool was updated and circulated for completion by UK critical care pharmacists. The tool captured workforce data disposition as it was just prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, at critical care unit level.

Main findings: Data were received for 334 critical care units from 203 organisations (96% of UK critical care units). Overall, 98.2% of UK critical care units had specific clinical pharmacist time dedicated to the unit. The median weekday pharmacist input to each level 3 equivalent bed was 0.066 (0.043-0.088) whole time equivalents, a significant increase from the median position in 2015 (+ 0.021, p < 0.0001). Despite this progress, pharmacist availability remains below national minimum standards (0.1/level 3 equivalent bed). Most units (71.9%) had access to prescribing pharmacists. Geographical variation in pharmacist staffing levels were evident, and weekend services remain extremely limited.

Conclusions: Availability of clinical pharmacists in UK adult critical care units is improving. However, national standards are not routinely met despite widely publicised quality indicators, commissioning specifications, and assessments. Additional measures are needed to address persistent deficits and realise gains in organisational and patient-level outcomes. These measures must include promotion of cross-professional collaborative working, adjusted funding models, and a nationally recognised training pathway for critical care pharmacists.

Keywords: Census; Distribution; Hospital; Intensive care; Organisation; Pharmacy; Planning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Whole time equivalent pharmacists per Level 3 equivalent bed, All 2015 versus All 2020, and displayed by NHS Region in 2020. Median difference + 0.021 wte per Level 3 equivalent bed, Mann–Whitney U, p < 0.0001
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Highest competence level of critical care pharmacy practice expertise available to organisation (2015 light blue bars, 2020 dark blue bars)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Characteristics of continuity of service arrangements for critical care pharmacists (2015 light blue bars, 2020 dark blue bars)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Box and whisker plots of whole time equivalent pharmacist time per level 3 equivalent bed (Monday–Friday) by activity.†median difference + 0.007 wte per level 3 equivalent bed, Mann–Whitney U, p < 0.001, ‡ median difference + 0.005 wte per level 3 equivalent bed, Mann–Whitney U, p < 0.001, § median difference + 0.004 wte per level 3 equivalent bed, Mann–Whitney U, p < 0.001

References

    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Medicines optimisation: the safe and effective use of medicines to enable the best possible outcomes. NICE guideline. 2015. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng5/chapter/1-recommendations. [Accessed 07/09/2022]. - PubMed
    1. Kane-Gill SL, Dasta JF, Buckley MS, et al. Clinical practice guideline: safe medication use in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:e877–e915. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002533. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee H, Ryu K, Sohn Y, Kim J, Suh GY, Kim EY. Impact on patient outcomes of pharmacist participation in multidisciplinary critical care teams: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2019;47:1243–1250. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003830. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bourne RS, Shulman R, Jennings JK. Reducing medication errors in critical care patients: pharmacist key resources and relationship with medicines optimisation. Int J Pharm Pract. 2018;26:534–540. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12430. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Devlin JW, McKenzie C. Expanding the reach of critical care pharmacists globally. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:328–330. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002879. - DOI - PubMed