Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Jan 3:101:skad099.
doi: 10.1093/jas/skad099.

Effects of dairy cow temperament on milk yield: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effects of dairy cow temperament on milk yield: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Maria G Marçal-Pedroza et al. J Anim Sci. .

Abstract

The temperament of dairy cows interferes in milk yield and quality, but there is a lack of consensus throughout the literature. Thus, systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) methodologies were used to assess the effects of dairy cow temperament on milk yield. Our literature search included four electronic databases (CABI Abstracts, Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus) and bibliographies of the publications included on MA. As inclusion criteria, we considered publications about the temperament of lactating cows and its effect on daily milk yield and total milk yield (whole lactation). A random effect-MA was carried out separately for daily milk yield and total milk yield related to each class of cows' temperament, 'low' (low reactivity, calm animals), 'intermediate' (intermediate reactivity), and 'high' (high reactivity, reactive animals). A total of eight publications reporting 75 trials were included in the analyses for daily milk yield, and three publications reporting nine trials for total milk yield. For daily and total milk yield the heterogeneity between publications was high (I2 = 99.9%). Cows of European breeds with intermediate temperament produced less milk daily than the calm (P = 0.020) and reactive ones (P < 0.001). In the case of primiparous cows, those with intermediate temperament produced less milk daily (P < 0.001) than the reactive ones, while for multiparous, the intermediate produced less than calm (P = 0.032) and reactive cows (P < 0.001). Regarding the stage of lactation, cows evaluated throughout lactation with a calm temperament tended (P = 0.081) to produce more milk than the intermediate ones, but less than the reactive ones (P < 0.001). For total milk yield, reactive cows tended to produce more than the calm (P = 0.082) and intermediate (P = 0.001) ones. Among European and primiparous cows, reactive cows produced more than the intermediate (P = 0.001). According to our results, we cannot confirm what we expected, that calmer cows would be the most productive for both daily and total yield.

Keywords: behavior; dairy cattle; performance; personality; reactivity.

Plain language summary

Individual differences in the behavior of dairy cows can affect their productive performance. In an attempt to summarize the scientific information available, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the effects of dairy cows’ temperament on milk yield. We hypothesize that calmer cows would produce more milk. We found nine publications with quantitative data available to be included in a meta-analysis. Eight additional publications that addressed the topic of interest but did not present data enough to be included in the meta-analysis (i.e., evaluated the relationships between temperament and milk yield using correlations or regressions) were used to perform a qualitative synthesis. The results of our meta-analysis indicated that the reactive cows were more productive than the calm or intermediate ones, contradicting our initial hypothesis. According to the results of the qualitative synthesis, most of the publications reported a negative association between reactive temperament and milk yield, indicating that calmer cows would produce more milk. We concluded that there are divergences in the information available about the temperament and production of dairy cows. We highlight the need for greater methodological and analytical standardization to allow a broader quantitative synthesis of the temperament effects on milk yield.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared no conflicts of interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram indicating the number of citations and publications included and excluded in each level of the systematic review on temperament of dairy cows and milk yield and milk quality, adapted from PRISMA guidelines (Page et al. 2021). All search results are included in the diagram to allow a better understanding of the total number of records found. *Data from both procedures (milk yield and milk quality) are presented in the flow diagram to allow the researchers to update the same systematic review.

References

    1. Abdel-Hamid, S. E., Fattah D. M. A., Ghanem H. M., and Manaa E. A. A.. . 2017. Temperament during milking process and its effect on behavioral, productive traits and biochemical, parameters in ­Friesian dairy cows. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 5:508–513. doi:10.17582/journal.aavs/2017/5.12.508.513. - DOI
    1. Antanaitis, R., Juozaitienė V., Jonike V., Čukauskas V., Urbšienė D., Urbšys A., Baumgartner W., and Paulauskas A.. . 2021. Relationship between temperament and stage of lactation, productivity and milk composition of dairy cows. Animals. 11:1840. doi:10.3390/ani11071840. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bertenshaw, C., Rowlinson P., Edge H., Douglas S., and Shiel R.. . 2008. The effect of diferent degrees of ‘positive’ human–animal interaction during rearing on the welfare and subsequent production of commercial dairy heifers. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 114:65–75. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2007.12.002. - DOI
    1. Borenstein, M., Hedges L.V., J. P. T., Higgins, and Rothstein H. R.. . 2009. Introduction to Meta-analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, The Atrium: Chichester, UK.
    1. Breuer, K., Hemsworth P. H., Barnett J. L., Matthews L. R.Coleman G. J.. . 2000. Behavioural response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 66:273–288. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00097-0. - DOI - PubMed