Decomposing risky decision-making in methamphetamine use disorder: Behavioral updating and D2 dopamine receptors
- PMID: 37004462
- PMCID: PMC10814877
- DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109860
Decomposing risky decision-making in methamphetamine use disorder: Behavioral updating and D2 dopamine receptors
Abstract
Background: Escalating misuse of amphetamine-type stimulants, mainly methamphetamine, has led to a staggering rise in associated overdose deaths and a pressing need to understand the basis of methamphetamine use disorder (MUD). MUD is characterized by disadvantageous decision-making, and people with MUD perform below controls on the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), a laboratory test of decision-making under uncertainty. The BART presents a series of choices with progressively higher stakes-greater risk of loss and greater potential monetary reward. This research aimed to clarify whether impaired behavioral updating contributes to maladaptive performance on the BART.
Methods: Two groups (28 drug-abstinent participants with MUD and 16 healthy control participants) were compared on BART performance. Using a computational model, we deconstructed behavior into risk-taking and behavioral updating. A subset of participants (22 MUD, 15 healthy control) underwent [18F]fallypride positron emission tomography scans to measure dopamine D2-type receptor availability (BPND) in the striatum (caudate and accumbens nuclei and putamen) and the globus pallidus.
Results: Participants with MUD exhibited slower behavioral updating than the healthy controls (p = 0.0004, d=1.77). BPND in all four bilateral volumes of interest were higher in the healthy control group (ps < 0.005, ds < 2.16), and updating rate correlated positively with BPND in the caudate nucleus (p = 0.002), putamen (p = 0.002), and globus pallidus (p = 0.03).
Conclusions: The findings indicate that behavioral updating contributes to maladaptive decision-making in MUD and suggest that dysregulation of D2-type receptor signaling in the striatum and globus pallidus contributes to this behavioral deficit.
Keywords: Computational psychiatry; Decision-making; Methamphetamine use disorder; Risk; Uncertainty.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures to report.
References
-
- Bechara A, Dolan S, Hindes A, 2002. Decision-making and addiction (part II): myopia for the future or hypersensitivity to reward? Neuropsychologia 40 (10), 1690–1705. - PubMed
-
- Benartzi S, Thaler RH, 1999. Risk aversion or myopia? Choices in repeated gambles and retirement investments. Manag. Sci 45 (3), 364–381.
-
- Brand M, Recknor EC, Grabenhorst F, Bechara A, 2007. Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: correlations with executive functions and comparisons of two different gambling tasks with implicit and explicit rules. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol 29 (1), 86–99. - PubMed
