Refining the thoracic surgical oncology regionalization standards for esophageal surgery in Ontario, Canada: Moving from good to better
- PMID: 37005118
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.03.002
Refining the thoracic surgical oncology regionalization standards for esophageal surgery in Ontario, Canada: Moving from good to better
Abstract
Background: The consolidation of surgical practices has been suggested to improve patient outcomes for complex surgeries. In 2005, Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario released the Thoracic Surgical Oncology Standards to facilitate the regionalization process at thoracic centers in Ontario, Canada. This work describes the quality-improvement process involved in updating the minimum surgical volume and supporting requirement recommendations for thoracic centers to further optimize patient care for esophageal cancer.
Methods: We conducted a literature review to identify and synthesize evidence informing the volume-outcome relationship related to esophagectomy. The results of this review and esophageal cancer surgery common indicators (reoperation rate, unplanned visit rate, 30-day and 90-day mortality) from Ontario's Surgical Quality Indicator Report were presented and reviewed by a Thoracic Esophageal Standards Expert Panel and Surgical Oncology Program Leads at Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario. Hospital outliers were identified, and a subgroup analysis was conducted to determine the most appropriate minimum surgical volume threshold based on 30- and 90-day mortality rates data from the last 3 fiscal years.
Results: Based on the finding that a significant decrease in mortality occurred at 12 to 15 esophagectomies per year, the Thoracic Esophageal Standards Expert Panel reached a consensus that thoracic centers should perform a minimum of 15 esophagectomies per year. The panel also recommended that any center performing esophagectomies have at least 3 thoracic surgeons to ensure continuity in clinical care.
Conclusions: We have described the process involved in updating the provincial minimum volume threshold and the appropriate support services for esophageal cancer surgery in Ontario.
Keywords: esophageal surgery; esophagectomy; thoracic surgical oncology regionalization standards; volume–outcomes.
Copyright © 2023 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Commentary: Refining regionalization standards for esophagectomy: Paving the way to improving esophageal cancer care in Canada and beyond.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Dec;166(6):1510-1511. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.06.005. Epub 2023 Jun 15. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023. PMID: 37330204 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Long-Term Impact of Regionalization of Thoracic Oncology Surgery.Ann Thorac Surg. 2025 Feb;119(2):460-469. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.10.002. Epub 2024 Oct 21. Ann Thorac Surg. 2025. PMID: 39442904
-
Variation in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome of Esophageal Cancer in a Regionalized Care System in Ontario, Canada.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2126090. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26090. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34546371 Free PMC article.
-
Readmission rates following esophageal cancer resection are similar at regionalized and non-regionalized centers: A population-based cohort study.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Sep;158(3):934-942.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.04.061. Epub 2019 May 3. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019. PMID: 31176552
-
[Consensus and controversies of surgical approach selection in the treatment for thoracic esophageal cancers].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 25;19(9):961-964. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016. PMID: 27680059 Review. Chinese.
-
Volume-Outcome Relationships in Thoracic Surgery.Thorac Surg Clin. 2017 Aug;27(3):251-256. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 May 5. Thorac Surg Clin. 2017. PMID: 28647071 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical