Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 15:4:1028273.
doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1028273. eCollection 2023.

Metrics for maternity unit staffing in low resource settings: Scoping review and proposed core indicator

William Stones  1 , Anjali Nair  2
Affiliations

Metrics for maternity unit staffing in low resource settings: Scoping review and proposed core indicator

William Stones et al. Front Glob Womens Health. .

Abstract

Background: The lack of usable indicators and benchmarks for staffing of maternity units in health facilities has constrained planning and effective program implementation for emergency obstetric and newborn care (EmONC) globally.

Objectives: To identify potential indicator(s) and benchmarks for EmONC facility staffing that might be applicable in low resource settings, we undertook a scoping review before proceeding to develop a proposed set of indicators.

Eligibility criteria: Population: women attending health facilities for care around the time of delivery and their newborns. Concept: reports of mandated norms or actual staffing levels in health facilities.

Context: studies conducted in healthcare facilities of any type that undertake delivery and newborn care and those from any geographic setting in both public and private sector facilities.

Sources of evidence and charting: Searches were limited to material published since 2000 in English or French, using Pubmed and a purposive search of national Ministry of Health, non-governmental organization and UN agency websites for relevant documents. A template for data extraction was designed.

Results: Data extraction was undertaken from 59 papers and reports including 29 descriptive journal articles, 17 national Ministry of Health documents, 5 Health Care Professional Association (HCPA) documents, two each of journal policy recommendation and comparative studies, one UN Agency document and 3 systematic reviews. Calculation or modelling of staffing ratios was based on delivery, admission or inpatient numbers in 34 reports, with 15 using facility designation as the basis for staffing norms. Other ratios were based on bed numbers or population metrics.

Conclusions: Taken together, the findings point to a need for staffing norms for delivery and newborn care that reflect numbers and competencies of staff physically present on each shift. A Core indicator is proposed, "Monthly mean delivery unit staffing ratio" calculated as number of annual births/365/monthly average shift staff census.

Keywords: EMONC; childbirth; facility; human resources for health; midwifery; staffing adequacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Reprinted from Tunçalp et al. 2015 (4) with permission.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reprinted from WHO 2007 (5) with permission.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF, Averting Maternal Death and Disability Program. Monitoring emergency obstetric care: A handbook. Geneva (2009). Available at: http://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/obstetric_monitoring.pdf
    1. Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, Ciapponi A, Colaci D, Comandé D, et al. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet. (2016) 388(10056):2176–92. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31472-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hulton L, Matthews Z, Stones R. A framework for evaluation of quality of care in maternity services. University of southampton. Southampton: University of Southampton (2000). Available at: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/40965/
    1. Tunçalp Ö, Were W, MacLennan C, Oladapo O, Gülmezoglu A, Bahl R, et al. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns—the WHO vision. BJOG. (2015) 122(8):1045–9. 10.1111/1471-0528.13451 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO. Everybody's business — strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes. WHO's Framework for action. Cited in: WHO 2010 “Monitoring the building blocks of health systems: a handbook of indicators and their measurement strategies”. Geneva. (2007).

Publication types