Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 29;9(4):e1467.
doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001467. eCollection 2023 Apr.

Selecting DCD Recipients Using Predictive Indices

Affiliations

Selecting DCD Recipients Using Predictive Indices

Saif Ganni et al. Transplant Direct. .

Abstract

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) allografts might represent one of the largest untapped sources of liver allografts. Our aim was to identify independent recipient risk factors that predict mortality in DCD allograft recipients to preselect optimal candidates for successful transplantation. Furthermore, we compared the application of our newly constructed DCD Recipient Selector Index (RSI) score to previously developed models to determine superiority in predicting recipient survival.

Methods: Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database, we performed univariate and multivariate retrospective analyses on 4228 DCD liver allograft recipients.

Results: We identified 8 significant factors and incorporated them into the weighted RSI to predict 3-mo survival following DCD liver transplantation with a C-statistic of 0.6971. The most significant recipient risk factors were recipient serum sodium levels >150 mEq/L at transplant, recipient albumin <2.0 g/dL at transplant, and a history of portal vein thrombosis. Because Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score components were included as individual predictors, the DCD RSI predicts survival independently of MELD. Upon comparison with 3 previous recipient risk scores-Balance of Risk, Renal Risk Index, Patient-Survival Outcomes Following Liver Transplantation-the DCD RSI was determined to be superior at selecting optimal candidates pre-DCD transplantation, yielding a C-statistic of 0.6971.

Conclusions: After verifying the performance of predictive indices for selection of DCD recipients, the DCD RSI is best used to preselect patients for optimized outcomes after DCD transplantation. This can increase utilization of DCD donors by improving outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan-Meier curve of recipient survival by the Donation after Circulatory Death Recipient Selector Index (DCD RSI) score. The y-axis is the percentage recipient survival of total recipients, and the x-axis is the months post–liver transplant. P < 0.001 for each group by log-rank test with reference to acceptable risk DCD RSI score group.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Calculations of area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for 3-mo survival show a Donation After Circulatory Death Recipient Selector Index (DCD RSI) C-statistic value of 0.6971 (CI, 0.6640-0.7305). CI, confidence interval.

References

    1. OPTN. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network National Data. US Department of Health and Human Services. 2020.
    1. Sher L, Quintini C, Fayek SA, et al. . Attitudes and barriers to the use of donation after cardiac death livers: comparison of a United States transplant center survey to the United Network for Organ Sharing data. Liver Transplant. 2017;23:1372–1383. - PubMed
    1. Haque O, Yuan Q, Uygun K, et al. . Evolving utilization of donation after circulatory death livers in liver transplantation: the day of DCD has come. Clin Transplant. 2021;35:e14211. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Howard RJ, Schold JD, Cornell DL. A 10-year analysis of organ donation after cardiac death in the United States. Transplantation. 2005;80:564–568. - PubMed
    1. Choi AY, Jawitz OK, Raman V, et al. . Predictors of nonuse of donation after circulatory death lung allografts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;161:458–466.e3. - PMC - PubMed