The prevalence and burden of Rome IV faecal incontinence in ulcerative colitis: A cross-sectional study
- PMID: 37012703
- DOI: 10.1111/apt.17502
The prevalence and burden of Rome IV faecal incontinence in ulcerative colitis: A cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background: Despite advances in ulcerative colitis (UC) therapies, a relatively undefined proportion of patients experience faecal incontinence (FI) in the absence of active inflammation. For this group, there remains a significant unmet need with a limited evidence base.
Aims: We aimed to estimate the prevalence and impact of FI in UC.
Methods: In a prospective cross-sectional study, patients with UC completed a series of validated questionnaires, including Rome IV FI criteria, an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-specific FI questionnaire (ICIQ-IBD), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and IBD-Control. UC remission was defined as faecal calprotectin (FCP) ≤250 μg/g, or IBD-control 8 score ≥13 and IBD-Control-VAS ≥ 85.
Results: Of 255 patients with UC, overall, 20.4% fulfilled Rome IV criteria for FI. Rome IV FI prevalence did not differ between active and quiescent UC regardless of whether disease activity was defined by IBD-Control scores ± FCP (p = 0.25), or objectively with FCP thresholds of 250 μg/g (p = 0.86) and 100 μg/g (p = 0.95). Most patients (75.2%) reported FI when in 'remission' and during 'relapse' (90.6%) according to ICIQ-IBD. Those who reported FI according to both ICIQ-IBD and Rome IV definitions had higher anxiety, depression and worse quality-of-life (QoL) scores (p < 0.05). In those with Rome IV FI, there was a strong correlation between FI symptom severity and impaired QoL (r = 0.809, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The prevalence of FI in UC is high, even in remission, and associated with significant psychological distress, symptom burden and impaired QoL. These findings highlight the urgent need for further research and development of evidence-based treatments for FI in UC.
Keywords: disorders of gut-brain interaction; faecal incontinence; inflammatory bowel disease; ulcerative colitis.
© 2023 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Comment in
-
Editorial: faecal incontinence in ulcerative colitis.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jul;58(1):114-115. doi: 10.1111/apt.17540. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2023. PMID: 37307545 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Shah SC, Colombel J-F, Sands BE, Narula N. Mucosal healing is associated with improved long-term outcomes of patients with ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(9):1245-1255.e8.
-
- Turner D, Ricciuto A, Lewis A, D'Amico F, Dhaliwal J, Griffiths AM, et al. STRIDE-II: an update on the selecting therapeutic targets in inflammatory bowel disease (STRIDE) initiative of the International Organization for the Study of IBD (IOIBD): determining therapeutic goals for treat-to-target strategies in IBD. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(5):1570-83.
-
- Park S, Abdi T, Gentry M, Laine L. Histological disease activity as a predictor of clinical relapse among patients with ulcerative colitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(12):1692-701.
-
- Saxena AP, Limdi JK, Farraye FA. Zeroing in on endoscopic and histologic mucosal healing to reduce the risk of colorectal neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86(6):1012-4.
-
- Li Y, Chen J, Bolinger AA, Chen H, Liu Z, Cong Y, et al. Target-based small molecule drug discovery towards novel therapeutics for inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021;27(Suppl 2):S38-62.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical