Personal, behavioural and socio-environmental correlates of emerging adults' sustainable food consumption in a cross-sectional analysis
- PMID: 37013850
- PMCID: PMC10346036
- DOI: 10.1017/S1368980023000654
Personal, behavioural and socio-environmental correlates of emerging adults' sustainable food consumption in a cross-sectional analysis
Abstract
Objective: Describe how dietary intake patterns of US young adults align with the EAT-Lancet Planetary Health Diet (PHD) sustainable diet goals and identify personal, behavioural, and socio-environmental correlates of sustainable intake.
Design: Data on past-year dietary intake were captured using a FFQ. The PHD was applied to specific food groups, and a total PHD score was calculated. Linear regression models were used to identify associations between personal, behavioural and socio-environmental factors and PHD scores.
Setting: This cross-sectional analysis uses data from the second wave of EAT 2010-2018 (Eating and Activity over Time), a population-based longitudinal study recruited in Minnesota.
Participants: Ethnically/racially diverse group of participants (n 1308) with a mean age of 22·1 (sd 2·0) years.
Results: The mean PHD score was 4·1 (sd 1·4) on a scale of 0-14, with 14 representing the most sustainable. On average, participants consumed fewer whole grains, fish, legumes, soya, and nuts than ideal for a sustainable diet, and an excess of eggs, added sugar, and meat. The PHD score was higher for participants with higher socio-economic status (SES) and greater educational attainment. Higher home availability of healthy food (β = 0·24, P < 0·001) and less frequent fast-food consumption (β = -0·26, P < 0·001) were the strongest correlates of PHD scores.
Conclusions: Results suggest that a high percentage of participants may not be achieving the sustainable diet goals defined by the PHD. Reductions in meat consumption and increases in plant-based foods are necessary to increase the sustainability of US young adults' diets.
Keywords: Animal-sourced food; Dietary intake; Nutrition; Planetary Health Diet; Plant-based food; Sustainable food consumption; Young adult.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- United Nation (2015) Paris Agreement, pp. 1–27. Paris: United Nations.
-
- Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B et al. (2019) The Lancet Commissions Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT – Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393, 447–492. - PubMed
-
- Kissinger G, Herold M, DeSy V et al. (2012) Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation: A Synthesis Report for REDD+ Policymakers. Vancouver, Canada: Lexeme Consulting. August 2012.
-
- Tilman D, Clark M, Williams DR et al. (2017) Future threats to biodiversity and pathways to their prevention. Nature 546, 73–81. - PubMed
-
- The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2019) World Health Organization. Sustainable Healthy Diets Guiding Principles. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241516648 (accessed May 2022).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous