Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 20;61(4):e0104922.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.01049-22. Epub 2023 Apr 4.

Automatic Discrimination of Species within the Enterobacter cloacae Complex Using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry and Supervised Algorithms

Affiliations

Automatic Discrimination of Species within the Enterobacter cloacae Complex Using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry and Supervised Algorithms

Ana Candela et al. J Clin Microbiol. .

Abstract

The Enterobacter cloacae complex (ECC) encompasses heterogeneous clusters of species that have been associated with nosocomial outbreaks. These species may have different acquired antimicrobial resistance and virulence mechanisms, and their identification is challenging. This study aims to develop predictive models based on matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) profiles and machine learning for species-level identification. A total of 219 ECC and 118 Klebsiella aerogenes clinical isolates from three hospitals were included. The capability of the proposed method to differentiate the most common ECC species (Enterobacter asburiae, Enterobacter kobei, Enterobacter hormaechei, Enterobacter roggenkampii, Enterobacter ludwigii, and Enterobacter bugandensis) and K. aerogenes was demonstrated by applying unsupervised hierarchical clustering with principal-component analysis (PCA) preprocessing. We observed a distinctive clustering of E. hormaechei and K. aerogenes and a clear trend for the rest of the ECC species to be differentiated over the development data set. Thus, we developed supervised, nonlinear predictive models (support vector machine with radial basis function and random forest). The external validation of these models with protein spectra from two participating hospitals yielded 100% correct species-level assignment for E. asburiae, E. kobei, and E. roggenkampii and between 91.2% and 98.0% for the remaining ECC species; with data analyzed in the three participating centers, the accuracy was close to 100%. Similar results were obtained with the Mass Spectrometric Identification (MSI) database developed recently (https://msi.happy-dev.fr) except in the case of E. hormaechei, which was more accurately identified with the random forest algorithm. In short, MALDI-TOF MS combined with machine learning was demonstrated to be a rapid and accurate method for the differentiation of ECC species.

Keywords: Enterobacter species; MALDI-TOF MS; machine learning; mass spectrometry; peak analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Comparative analysis of 126 MALDI-TOF MS spectra from K. aerogenes and different ECC species using unsupervised methods. (A) Dendrogram built with 126 spectra using Euclidean distance and Ward metric. Spectra from K. aerogenes (purple) and E. hormaechei (dark blue) are completely separated from the other species. (B) PCA of feasibility study spectra. K. aerogenes and E. hormaechei are completely separated. Visualization in three dimensions was needed for separation of E. ludwigii (yellow). (C) t-SNE analysis of study spectra. (D) PCA eigenvalues showing the variance of each component A total of 14 components were needed to reach 95% of the total data variance.
FIG 2
FIG 2
RF distance plot using Euclidean distance for MALDI-TOF MS spectra from the species included in the classification model.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) values obtained with different supervised algorithms for the two participating centers. (A) SVM-R model validated with UHRC strains. (B) RF model validated with UHRC strains. (C) SVM-R model validated with UHB strains. (D) RF model validated with UHB strains.

References

    1. Mezzatesta ML, Gona F, Stefani S. 2012. Enterobacter cloacae complex: clinical impact and emerging antibiotic resistance. Future Microbiol 7:887–902. doi:10.2217/fmb.12.61. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akbari M, Bakhshi B, Najar Peerayeh S. 2016. Particular distribution of Enterobacter cloacae strains isolated from urinary tract infection within clonal complexes. Iran Biomed J 20:49–55. doi:10.7508/ibj.2016.01.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kremer A, Hoffmann H. 2012. Prevalences of the Enterobacter cloacae complex and its phylogenetic derivatives in the nosocomial environment. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31:2951–2955. doi:10.1007/s10096-012-1646-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davin-Regli A, Lavigne JP, Pages JM. 2019. Enterobacter spp.: update on taxonomy, clinical aspects, and emerging antimicrobial resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 32:e00002-19. doi:10.1128/CMR.00002-19. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoffmann H, Roggenkamp A. 2003. Population genetics of the nomenspecies Enterobacter cloacae. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:5306–5318. doi:10.1128/AEM.69.9.5306-5318.2003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources