Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Aug;132(2):132-145.
doi: 10.1111/bju.16022. Epub 2023 Apr 20.

Role of pelvic drain and timing of urethral catheter removal following RARP: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Role of pelvic drain and timing of urethral catheter removal following RARP: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Takafumi Yanagisawa et al. BJU Int. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the clinical value of routine pelvic drain (PD) placement and early removal of urethral catheter (UC) in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), as perioperative management such as the necessity of PD or optimal timing for UC removal remains highly variable.

Methods: Multiple databases were searched for articles published before March 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they investigated the differential rate of postoperative complications between patients with/without routine PD placement and with/without early UC removal, defined as UC removal at 2-4 days after RARP.

Results: Overall, eight studies comprising 5112 patients were eligible for the analysis of PD placement, and six studies comprising 2598 patients were eligible for the analysis of UC removal. There were no differences in the rate of any complications (pooled odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-1.00), severe complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥III; pooled OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.54-1.69), all and/or symptomatic lymphocele (pooled OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.50-1.33; and pooled OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.26-1.29, respectively) between patients with or without routine PD placement. Furthermore, avoiding PD placement decreased the rate of postoperative ileus (pooled OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.91). Early removal of UC resulted in an increased likelihood of urinary retention (OR 6.21, 95% CI 3.54-10.9) in retrospective, but not in prospective studies. There were no differences in anastomosis leakage and early continence rates between patients with or those without early removal of UC.

Conclusions: There is no benefit for routine PD placement after standard RARP in the published articles. Early removal of UC seems possible with the caveat of the increased risk of urinary retention, while the effect on medium-term continence is still unclear. These data may help guide the standardisation of postoperative procedures by avoiding unnecessary interventions, thereby reducing potential complications and associated costs.

Keywords: pelvic drain; perioperative complication; prostate cancer; robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; urethral catheter.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Laparoscopy/New Technology.
    Cadeddu JA. Cadeddu JA. J Urol. 2024 Jan;211(1):190. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003688. Epub 2023 Oct 20. J Urol. 2024. PMID: 37861088 No abstract available.

References

    1. Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer-2020 update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 2021; 79: 243-62
    1. Mazzone E, Mistretta FA, Knipper S et al. Contemporary national assessment of robot-assisted surgery rates and total hospital charges for major surgical uro-oncological procedures in the United States. J Endourol 2019; 33: 438-47
    1. Ploussard G, Grabia A, Beauval JB et al. A 5-year contemporary nationwide evolution of the radical prostatectomy landscape. Eur Urol Open Sci 2021; 34: 1-4
    1. Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 405-17
    1. Lantz A, Bock D, Akre O et al. Functional and oncological outcomes after open versus robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer: 8-year follow-up. Eur Urol 2021; 80: 650-60

LinkOut - more resources