Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 4;10(1):40.
doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00601-3.

Current trends in graft choice for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - part II: In-vivo kinematics, patient reported outcomes, re-rupture rates, strength recovery, return to sports and complications

Affiliations

Current trends in graft choice for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - part II: In-vivo kinematics, patient reported outcomes, re-rupture rates, strength recovery, return to sports and complications

Armin Runer et al. J Exp Orthop. .

Abstract

Postoperative patient satisfaction after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is influenced mainly by the degree of pain, the need for reoperation, and functional performance in daily activities and sports. Graft choice has shown to have an influence on postoperative outcomes after ACL-R. While patient reported outcomes measurements do not differ between graft options, evidence shows that normal knee kinematics is not fully restored after ACL-R with an increase in postoperative anterior tibial translation (ATT). Postoperative graft rupture rates seem to favor bone-patella-tendon-bone (BPTB) and quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts over HT or allografts. While return to sports rates seem comparable between different graft types, postoperative extensor strength is reduced in patients with BPTB and QT whereas flexion strength is weakened in patients with HT. Postoperative donor site morbidity is highest in BPTB but comparable between HT and QT. With all graft options having advantages and drawbacks, graft choice must be individualized and chosen in accordance with the patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest with the present study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ajrawat P, Dwyer T, Whelan D, Theodoropoulos J, Murnaghan L, Bhargava M, Ogilvie-Harris D, Chahal J. A comparison of quadriceps tendon autograft with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and hamstring tendon autograft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and quantitative synthesis. Clin J Sport Med. 2021;31(4):392–399. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000765. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akoto R, Albers M, Balke M, Bouillon B, Hoher J. ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon graft and press-fit fixation versus quadruple hamstring graft and interference screw fixation - a matched pair analysis after one year follow up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2499-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andernord D, Bjornsson H, Petzold M, Eriksson BI, Forssblad M, Karlsson J, Samuelsson K. Surgical predictors of early revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Swedish national knee ligament register on 13,102 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(7):1574–1582. doi: 10.1177/0363546514531396. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderst W, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH, Tashman S, Karlsson J, Musahl V. In search of a gold standard for objective clinical outcome: using dynamic biplane radiography to measure knee kinematics. Knee Surg, Sports Traumatol, Arthrosc. 2022;30(5):1499–1501. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06781-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA. Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(7):596–606. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.076364. - DOI - PubMed