Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun;27(6):991-1008.
doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03641-4. Epub 2023 Apr 4.

A Conceptual Framework for Group Well-Child Care: A Tool to Guide Implementation, Evaluation, and Research

Affiliations
Review

A Conceptual Framework for Group Well-Child Care: A Tool to Guide Implementation, Evaluation, and Research

Ashley Gresh et al. Matern Child Health J. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To use scoping review methods to construct a conceptual framework based on current evidence of group well-child care to guide future practice and research.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review using Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) six stages. We used constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the quadruple aim of health care improvement to guide the construction of the conceptual framework.

Results: The resulting conceptual framework is a synthesis of the key concepts of group well-child care, beginning with a call for a system redesign of well-child care to improve outcomes while acknowledging the theoretical antecedents structuring the rationale that supports the model. Inputs of group well-child care include health systems contexts; administration/logistics; clinical setting; group care clinic team; community/patient population; and curriculum development and training. The core components of group well-child care included structure (e.g., group size, facilitators), content (e.g., health assessments, service linkages). and process (e.g., interactive learning and community building). We found clinical outcomes in all four dimensions of the quadruple aim of healthcare.

Conclusion: Our conceptual framework can guide model implementation and identifies several outcomes that can be used to harmonize model evaluation and research. Future research and practice can use the conceptual framework as a tool to standardize model implementation and evaluation and generate evidence to inform future healthcare policy and practice.

Keywords: Group care; Group well-child care; Maternal and child health; Pediatric primary care; Preventive medicine/methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Not applicable.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
GWCC conceptual framework

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. ACOG Optimizing postpartum care. ACOG committee opinion No. 736. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018;131:e140–150. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002633. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson J. Rejuvenate your practice with group visits. Contemporary Pediatrics. 2006;23(5):80–94.
    1. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice. 2005;8(1):19–32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616. - DOI
    1. Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health and cost. Health Affairs. 2008;27(3):759–769. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bialostozky A, McFadden SE, Barkin S. A novel approach to well-child visits for latino children under two years of age. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 2016;27(4):1647–1655. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2016.0153. - DOI - PubMed