Predictive factors for treatment outcomes with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections in diabetic macular edema in clinical practice
- PMID: 37016462
- PMCID: PMC10074667
- DOI: 10.1186/s40942-023-00453-0
Predictive factors for treatment outcomes with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections in diabetic macular edema in clinical practice
Abstract
Background: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections are the standard of care for diabetic macular edema (DME), a common complication of diabetes. This study aimed to identify factors influencing DME intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment outcomes in real-world practice.
Methods: This was a multi-center retrospective observational study using medical chart review of participants receiving anti-VEGF injections for DME (N = 248). Demographic and clinical variables were assessed for association with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) outcomes using regression models.
Results: There was a significant improvement in BCVA (p < 0.001) and CMT (p < 0.001) after 12 months of treatment, although 21% of participants had decreased BCVA, and 41% had a < 10% CMT reduction at 12 months. Higher baseline BCVA (p = 0.022, OR=-0.024, 95% CI=-0.046,-0.004) and longer duration of diabetic retinopathy (p = 0.048, OR=-0.064, 95% CI=-0.129,-0.001) were negative predictors for BCVA response, whereas Aflibercept treatment (p = 0.017, OR = 1.107, 95% CI = 0.220,2.051) compared with other drugs and a positive "early functional response" (p < 0.001, OR=-1.393, 95% CI=-1.946,-0.857) were positive predictors. A higher baseline CMT (p < 0.001, OR = 0.019, 95% CI = 0.012,0.0261) and an "early anatomical response", (p < 0.001, OR=-1.677, 95% CI=-2.456, -0.943) were predictors for greater reduction in CMT. Overall, the variables could predict only 23% of BCVA and 52% of CMT response.
Conclusions: The study shows a significant proportion of DME patients do not respond to anti-VEGF therapy and identifies several clinical predictors for treatment outcomes.
Trial registration: The study was approved through the Human Research Ethics Committee, University of Tasmania (approval number H0012902), and the Southern Adelaide Clinical Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number 86 - 067).
Keywords: Anti-VEGF; Best-corrected visual acuity; Central macular thickness; Diabetic macular edema.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Thomas R, Halim S, Gurudas S, Sivaprasad S, Owens D. IDF Diabetes Atlas: A review of studies utilising retinal photography on the global prevalence of diabetes related retinopathy between 2015 and 2018. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019:107840. - PubMed
-
- Brown DM, Nguyen QD, Marcus DM, Boyer DS, Patel S, Feiner L et al. Long-term outcomes of ranibizumab therapy for diabetic macular edema: the 36-month results from two phase III trials: RISE and RIDE.Ophthalmology. 2013;120(10). - PubMed
-
- Bressler SB, Glassman AR, Almukhtar T, Bressler NM, Ferris FL, Googe JM, Jr, et al. Five-year outcomes of ranibizumab with prompt or deferred laser versus laser or triamcinolone plus deferred ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;164:57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.12.025. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
- Tasmanian Community Fund/Tasmanian Community Fund
- GNT1116360/National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Australia Centre for Research Excellence
- Royal Hobart Hospital Research Foundation/Royal Hobart Hospital Research Foundation
- Diabetes Tasmania Post graduate research scholarship/Diabetes Tasmania Post graduate research scholarship
- Patricia F Gordon Top Up Scholarship/Patricia F Gordon Top Up Scholarship
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
