Economic burden of skin and skin structure infections due to Gram-positive bacteria in patients on hospital at home-based outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT)
- PMID: 37017118
- PMCID: PMC10238797
- DOI: 10.37201/req/134.2022
Economic burden of skin and skin structure infections due to Gram-positive bacteria in patients on hospital at home-based outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT)
Abstract
Objective: To describe and quantify resource use and direct health costs associated with skin and skin structure infections (SSSIs) caused by Gram-positive bacteria in adults receiving outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), administered by Hospital at Home units (HaH) in Spain.
Methods: Observational, multicenter, retrospective study. We included patients of both sexes included in the HaH-based OPAT Registry during 2011 to 2017 who were hospitalized due to SSSIs caused by Gram-positive bacteria. Resource use included home visits (nurses and physician), emergency room visits, conventional hospitalization stay, HaH stay and antibiotic treatment. Costs were quantified by multiplying the natural units of the resources by the corresponding unit cost. All costs were updated to 2019 euros.
Results: We included 194 episodes in 189 patients from 24 Spanish hospitals. The most frequent main diagnoses were cellulitis (26.8%) and surgical wound infection (24.2%), and 94% of episodes resulted in clinical improvement or cure after treatment. The median HaH stay was 13 days (interquartile range [IR]:8-22.7), and the conventional hospitalization stay was 5 days (IR: 1-10.7). The mean total cost attributable to the complete infectious process was €7,326 (95% confidence interval: €6,316-€8,416).
Conclusions: Our results suggest that OPAT administered by HaH is a safe and efficient alternative for the management of these infections and could lead to lower costs compared with hospital admission.
Objetivo: Describir y cuantificar el uso de recursos y costes directos sanitarios asociados con las infecciones de piel y tejidos blandos (IPPB) causadas por microorganismos gram-positivos en adultos que recibieron tratamiento antimicrobiano domiciliario endovenoso (TADE), administrado en unidades de hospitalización a domicilio (HaD) en España.
Material y métodos: Estudio observacional, multicéntrico, retrospectivo. Se incluyeron pacientes adultos de ambos sexos, incluidos en el Registro TADE en el periodo 2011 a 2017 y cuyo motivo de ingreso fue una IPPB causada por un micro-organismo Grampositivo. El uso de recursos incluyó las visitas a domicilio (enfermería y médico), visitas a urgencias, estancia en hospitalización convencional, estancia en HaD y tratamiento antibiótico. Los costes se cuantificaron multiplicando las unidades naturales de los recursos por el coste unitario correspondiente. Todos los costes fueron actualizados a euros de 2019.
Resultados: Se incluyeron 194 episodios (189 pacientes) procedentes de 24 centros españoles. Los diagnósticos principales más frecuentes fueron celulitis (26,8%) e infección por herida quirúrgica (24,2%). El 94% de los episodios resultaron en una mejoría o curación clínica al finalizar el tratamiento. La mediana de la estancia en HaD fue de 13 días (rango intercuar- tílico [RI]:8-22,7), con una estancia previa en hospitalización convencional de 5 días (RI: 1-10,7). El coste total promedio atribuible al proceso infecciosos completo fue de 7.326€ (in-tervalo de confianza del 95%: 6.316€-8.416 €).
Conclusiones: Este estudio sugiere que el TADE administrado en HaD es una alternativa segura y eficiente para el manejo de estas infecciones y podría conducir a menores costes en comparación con el ingreso hospitalario.
Keywords: Hospital at home; cost analysis; outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy; skin and skin structure infections.
©The Author 2023. Published by Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Conflict of interest statement
Manuel Mirón Rubio received fees as a speaker in conferences from Merck Sharp and Dohme, Aldo-Unión Lab, and has lectured at meetings organized by pharmaceutical companies (Merck Share and Dohme, Rovi, Angelini Pharma) or participated in some medical advice.
Juan José Parra Jordán reported no conflicts of interest
Víctor José González Ramallo received fees as a speaker in
conferences from Advanz Pharma, Angelini and MSD
Abel Mujal Martínez received fees as a speaker in conferences from MSD and Advanz Pharma.
Josefina Fernández-Muixí reported no conflicts of interest.
Marina Iglesias Gallego reported no conflicts of interest.
María Cruz Lucas Núñez reported no conflicts of interest
Elisa Rodado Alabau reported no conflicts of interest.
Sandra Vidal Perez-Campoamor is an employee of Merck Sharp& Dohme
Estefany Uría is an employee of Pharmalex Spain
Figures



Similar articles
-
Costs of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) administered by Hospital at Home units in Spain.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017 Jul;50(1):114-118. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 May 9. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017. PMID: 28499957
-
Efficiency of a self-administered outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (s-opat) for infective endocarditis within the context of a shortened hospital admission based on hospital at home program.Hosp Pract (1995). 2017 Dec;45(5):246-252. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2017.1398588. Epub 2017 Nov 10. Hosp Pract (1995). 2017. PMID: 29090606
-
Clinical efficacy, cost analysis and patient acceptability of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT): a decade of Sheffield (UK) OPAT service.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Jan;51(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.03.016. Epub 2017 Jun 30. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018. PMID: 28673610
-
Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy: principles and practice.Eur J Intern Med. 2013 Oct;24(7):617-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2013.03.014. Epub 2013 Apr 18. Eur J Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23602223 Review.
-
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy today.Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Sep 15;51 Suppl 2:S198-208. doi: 10.1086/653520. Clin Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 20731577 Review.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) for patients with cranial infection.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 24;10:1202969. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1202969. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37942421 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Conde García M del C, Patiño Ortega HD. Protocolo de infecciones bacterianas agudas de la piel y partes blandas. SESCAM 2016.
-
- Raya-Cruz M, Ferullo I, Arrizabalaga-Asenjo M, Nadal-Nadal A, Díaz-Antolín MP, Garau-Colom M, et al. . [Skin and soft-tissue infections in hospitalized patients: epidemiology, microbiological, clinical and prognostic factors]. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2014;32:152–9. 10.1016/j.eimc.2013.03.004. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Llopis F, González-Castillo J, Julián-Jiménez A, Ferré C, Gamazo-Río JJ, Martínez M, et al. . [Review of 1.250 episodes of skin and soft tissue infections attended at 49 hospital emergency departments].Rev Esp Quimioter 2014;27:115–21. - PubMed
-
- Pulido-Cejudo A, Guzmán-Gutierrez M, Jalife-Montaño A, Ortiz-Covarrubias A, Martínez-Ordaz JL, Noyola-Villalobos HF, et al. . Management of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections with a focus on patients at high risk of treatment failure. Ther Adv Infect Dis 2017;4:143–61. 10.1177/2049936117723228. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical