What Happens After a Vertebral Body Tether Break? Incidence, Location, and Progression With Five-year Follow-up
- PMID: 37018440
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004665
What Happens After a Vertebral Body Tether Break? Incidence, Location, and Progression With Five-year Follow-up
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective review.
Objective: To study risk factors for anterior vertebral body tether (VBT) breakage.
Summary of background data: VBT is used to treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in skeletally immature patients. However, tethers break in up to 48% of cases.
Materials and methods: We reviewed 63 patients who underwent thoracic and/or lumbar VBT with a minimum five-year follow-up. We radiographically characterized suspected tether breaks as a change in interscrew angle >5°. Demographic, radiographic, and clinical risk factors for presumed VBT breaks were evaluated.
Results: In confirmed VBT breaks, the average interscrew angle change was 8.1°, and segmental coronal curve change was 13.6°, with a high correlation ( r =0.82). Our presumed VBT break cohort constituted 50 thoracic tethers, four lumbar tethers, and nine combined thoracic/lumbar tethers; the average age was 12.1±1.2 years and the mean follow-up was 73.1±11.7 months. Of 59 patients with thoracic VBTs, 12 patients (20.3%) had a total of 18 breaks. Eleven thoracic breaks (61.1%) occurred between two and five years postoperatively, and 15 (83.3%) occurred below the curve apex ( P <0.05). The timing of thoracic VBT breakage moderately correlated with more distal breaks ( r =0.35). Of 13 patients who underwent lumbar VBT, eight patients (61.5%) had a total of 12 presumed breaks. Six lumbar breaks (50%) occurred between one and two years postoperatively, and seven (58.3%) occurred at or distal to the apex. Age, sex, body mass index, Risser score, and curve flexibility were not associated with VBT breaks, but the association between percent curve correction and thoracic VBT breakage trended toward significance ( P =0.054). Lumbar VBTs were more likely to break than thoracic VBTs ( P =0.016). Seven of the patients with presumed VBT breaks (35%) underwent revision surgery.
Conclusions: Lumbar VBTs broke with greater frequency than thoracic VBTs, and VBT breaks typically occurred at levels distal to the curve apex. Only 15% of all patients required revision.
Level of evidence: 3.
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
A.F.S.: consultant for DePuy Synthes Spine, Ethicon, Globus Medical, Medical Device Business Services, Mirus, NuVasive, Orthofix, Stryker, ZimVie; Royalties from NuVasive and ZimVie. J.M.P.: consultant for DePuy Synthes Spine, NuVasive, and ZimVie. S.W.H.: consultant for NuVasive, ZimVie; Speakers bureau DePuy Synthes Spine, NuVasive, ZimVie; Stocks/options: Auctus. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Samdani AF, Ames RJ, Kimball JS, et al. Anterior vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: two-year results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2014;39:1688–93.
-
- Trobisch PD, Baroncini A. Preliminary outcomes after vertebral body tethering (VBT) for lumbar curves and subanalysis of a 1- versus 2-tether construct. Eur Spine J. 2021;30:3570–76.
-
- Yucekul A, Akpunarli B, Durbas A, et al. Does vertebral body tethering cause disc and facet joint degeneration? A preliminary MRI study with minimum two years follow-up. Spine J. 2021;21:1793–801.
-
- Baroncini A, Trobisch PD, Birkenmaier C, et al. Radiographic results after vertebral body tethering. Z Orthop Unfall. 2022;160:387–92.
-
- Baker CE, Kiebzak GM, Neal KM. Anterior vertebral body tethering shows mixed results at 2-year follow-up. Spine Deform. 2021;9:481–489.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
