Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 5;13(4):e070280.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070280.

Comparing biparametric to multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men (PRIME): a prospective, international, multicentre, non-inferiority within-patient, diagnostic yield trial protocol

Collaborators, Affiliations

Comparing biparametric to multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men (PRIME): a prospective, international, multicentre, non-inferiority within-patient, diagnostic yield trial protocol

Aqua Asif et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate MRI is a well-established tool for the diagnostic work-up for men with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). Current recommendations advocate the use of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), which is composed of three sequences: T2-weighted sequence (T2W), diffusion-weighted sequence (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequence (DCE). Prior studies suggest that a biparametric MRI (bpMRI) approach, omitting the DCE sequences, may not compromise clinically significant cancer detection, though there are limitations to these studies, and it is not known how this may affect treatment eligibility. A bpMRI approach will reduce scanning time, may be more cost-effective and, at a population level, will allow more men to gain access to an MRI than an mpMRI approach.

Methods: Prostate Imaging Using MRI±Contrast Enhancement (PRIME) is a prospective, international, multicentre, within-patient diagnostic yield trial assessing whether bpMRI is non-inferior to mpMRI in the diagnosis of clinically significant PCa. Patients will undergo the full mpMRI scan. Radiologists will be blinded to the DCE and will initially report the MRI using only the bpMRI (T2W and DWI) sequences. They will then be unblinded to the DCE sequence and will then re-report the MRI using the mpMRI sequences (T2W, DWI and DCE). Men with suspicious lesions on either bpMRI or mpMRI will undergo prostate biopsy. The main inclusion criteria are men with suspected PCa, with a serum PSA of ≤20 ng/mL and without prior prostate biopsy. The primary outcome is the proportion of men with clinically significant PCa detected (Gleason score ≥3+4 or Gleason grade group ≥2). A sample size of at least 500 patients is required. Key secondary outcomes include the proportion of clinically insignificant PCa detected and treatment decision.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the National Research Ethics Committee West Midlands, Nottingham (21/WM/0091). Results of this trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. Participants and relevant patient support groups will be informed about the results of the trial.

Trial registration number: NCT04571840.

Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate disease; Protocols & guidelines; RADIOLOGY & IMAGING; Urological tumours.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: AN is an academic clinical fellow funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research. PK is an academic clinical fellow funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research and The Urology Foundation. FG is a recipient of the 2020 Young Investigator Award (20YOUN15) funded by the Prostate Cancer Foundation / CRIS Cancer Foundation. SP is supported by the National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR), UCLH and UCL Biomedical Research Centre. ME receives research support from the National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR), UCLH and UCL Biomedical Research Centre. YT is funded by a UK NIHR Postdoctoral Fellowship and supported by the NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre. CMM is an NIHR Research Professor, and receives grants from MRC, CRUK, Movember, and Prostate Cancer UK. VK is funded by Prostate Cancer UK and The John Black Charitable Foundation. He receives speaker fees from the European Association of Urology, Singapore Urology Association, The Clinical Comms Group and Got IT consulting SL. All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Prostate Imaging Using MRI±Contrast Enhancement trial schema—the approach prior to MRI. *indicates a 1–5 scale of suspicion for the likelihood that clinically significant PCa is present, with 5 representing the greatest score of suspicion. For MRI to be non-suspicious it needs to be scored 1 or 2 on both Likert and PI-RADS V.2.1 systems. For MRI to be suspicious it can be scored 3, 4 or 5 on either Likert or PI-RADS V.2.1 systems. bpMRI, biparametric MRI; DCE, dynamic contrast-enhanced sequence; DRE, digital rectal examination; DWI, diffusion-weighted sequence; mpMRI, multiparametric MRI; PI-RADS, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; T2W, T2-weighted sequence.

References

    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. . Spirit 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346:e7586. 10.1136/bmj.e7586 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mottet N, Cornford P, Van Den Bergh R, et al. . EAU guidelines: prostate cancer. European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands; 2021. Available: https://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer/
    1. Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, et al. . MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1767–77. 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. National prostate cancer audit. Annual Report 2019; Available: https://www.npca.org.uk/reports/npca-annual-report-2019/
    1. Verma S, Turkbey B, Muradyan N, et al. . Overview of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer diagnosis and management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:1277–88. 10.2214/AJR.12.8510 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data