Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 5;16(1):73.
doi: 10.1186/s12920-023-01503-0.

Implementation and evaluation of personal genetic testing as part of genomics analysis courses in German universities

Affiliations

Implementation and evaluation of personal genetic testing as part of genomics analysis courses in German universities

Tamara Slosarek et al. BMC Med Genomics. .

Abstract

Purpose: Due to the increasing application of genome analysis and interpretation in medical disciplines, professionals require adequate education. Here, we present the implementation of personal genotyping as an educational tool in two genomics courses targeting Digital Health students at the Hasso Plattner Institute (HPI) and medical students at the Technical University of Munich (TUM).

Methods: We compared and evaluated the courses and the students' perceptions on the course setup using questionnaires.

Results: During the course, students changed their attitudes towards genotyping (HPI: 79% [15 of 19], TUM: 47% [25 of 53]). Predominantly, students became more critical of personal genotyping (HPI: 73% [11 of 15], TUM: 72% [18 of 25]) and most students stated that genetic analyses should not be allowed without genetic counseling (HPI: 79% [15 of 19], TUM: 70% [37 of 53]). Students found the personal genotyping component useful (HPI: 89% [17 of 19], TUM: 92% [49 of 53]) and recommended its inclusion in future courses (HPI: 95% [18 of 19], TUM: 98% [52 of 53]).

Conclusion: Students perceived the personal genotyping component as valuable in the described genomics courses. The implementation described here can serve as an example for future courses in Europe.

Keywords: Genomics education; Personal genotyping; Personalized medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Drs. Andlauer and Schurmann are salaried employees of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma and Bayer AG, respectively. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Timeline of the analyze your personal genome course. Magenta items indicate questionnaire periods, blue items teaching activities, and yellow items events related to data

Similar articles

References

    1. Green ED, Gunter C, Biesecker LG, et al. Strategic vision for improving human health at The Forefront of Genomics. Nature. 2020;586:683–692. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2817-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blagec K, Koopmann R, Crommentuijn-Van Rhenen M, et al. Implementing pharmacogenomics decision support across seven European countries: the Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics (U-PGx) project. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018;25(7):893–898. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Widén E, Junna N, Ruotsalainen S, et al. How communicating polygenic and clinical risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease impacts health behavior: an observational follow-up study. Circ Genomic Precis Med. 2022;15(2):e003459. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.121.003459. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manolio TA, Rowley R, Williams MS, et al. Opportunities, resources, and techniques for implementing genomics in clinical care. Lancet. 2019;394(10197):511–520. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31140-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wray NR, Lin T, Austin J, et al. From basic science to clinical application of polygenic risk scores: a primer. JAMA Psychiat. 2021;78(1):101–109. doi: 10.1001/JAMAPSYCHIATRY.2020.3049. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types