Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Mar 20:17:1133367.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1133367. eCollection 2023.

The role of the salience network in cognitive and affective deficits

Affiliations
Review

The role of the salience network in cognitive and affective deficits

Jakub Schimmelpfennig et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

Analysis and interpretation of studies on cognitive and affective dysregulation often draw upon the network paradigm, especially the Triple Network Model, which consists of the default mode network (DMN), the frontoparietal network (FPN), and the salience network (SN). DMN activity is primarily dominant during cognitive leisure and self-monitoring processes. The FPN peaks during task involvement and cognitive exertion. Meanwhile, the SN serves as a dynamic "switch" between the DMN and FPN, in line with salience and cognitive demand. In the cognitive and affective domains, dysfunctions involving SN activity are connected to a broad spectrum of deficits and maladaptive behavioral patterns in a variety of clinical disorders, such as depression, insomnia, narcissism, PTSD (in the case of SN hyperactivity), chronic pain, and anxiety, high degrees of neuroticism, schizophrenia, epilepsy, autism, and neurodegenerative illnesses, bipolar disorder (in the case of SN hypoactivity). We discuss behavioral and neurological data from various research domains and present an integrated perspective indicating that these conditions can be associated with a widespread disruption in predictive coding at multiple hierarchical levels. We delineate the fundamental ideas of the brain network paradigm and contrast them with the conventional modular method in the first section of this article. Following this, we outline the interaction model of the key functional brain networks and highlight recent studies coupling SN-related dysfunctions with cognitive and affective impairments.

Keywords: affective dysfunctions; cognitive dysfunctions; default mode network (DMN); salience network (SN); the frontoparietal network (FPN); triple network model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Three canonical networks.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A basic interaction model of the three canonical networks.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams R. A., Vincent P., Benrimoh D., Friston K. J., Parr T. (2022). Everything is connected: inference and attractors in delusions. Schizophr. Res. 245, 5–22. 10.1016/j.schres.2021.07.032 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akiki T. J., Averill C. L., Abdallah C. G. (2017). A network-based neurobiological model of PTSD: evidence from structural and functional neuroimaging studies. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 19:81. 10.1007/s11920-017-0840-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banovac I., Sedmak D., Judaš M., Petanjek Z. (2021). Von economo neurons - primate-specific or commonplace in the mammalian brain? Front. Neural Circuits 15:714611. 10.3389/fncir.2021.714611 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrett L. F., Satpute A. B. (2013). Large-scale brain networks in affective and social neuroscience: towards an integrative functional architecture of the brain. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 23, 361–372. 10.1016/j.conb.2012.12.012 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrett L. F., Simmons W. K. (2015). Interoceptive predictions in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 419–429. 10.1038/nrn3950 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources