Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 1;27(4):201-209.
doi: 10.1089/apb.2022.0022. Epub 2022 Nov 23.

Food and Drug Administration Guidance on Design of Clinical Trials for Gene Therapy Products with Potential for Genome Integration or Genome Editing and Associated Long-Term Follow-Up of Research Subjects

Affiliations
Review

Food and Drug Administration Guidance on Design of Clinical Trials for Gene Therapy Products with Potential for Genome Integration or Genome Editing and Associated Long-Term Follow-Up of Research Subjects

Daniel Eisenman et al. Appl Biosaf. .

Abstract

Introduction: With the burgeoning growth of the gene therapy industry, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has produced various guidance documents intended to help gene therapy manufacturers design their preclinical testing and clinical trials to facilitate the process of obtaining marketing approval.

Discussion: Biosafety professionals and institutional biosafety committees (IBCs) with oversight of clinical trials or biopharmaceutical manufacturing stand to benefit from understanding how these guidance documents set the standard for writing the clinical research protocols that are reviewed by IBCs. Although the FDA guidance documents are typically meant for manufacturers (either pharmaceutical companies serving as research sponsors or investigators at academic institutions), much of the content is useful for biosafety professionals and IBCs during the IBC review process.

Conclusion: This article specifically addresses guidance documents pertaining to gene therapy vectors capable of genomic integration, testing for replication competent retrovirus, genome editing, and long-term follow-up of research subjects.

Keywords: FDA guidance; clinical trials; gene editing; gene therapy; long-term follow-up; replication competent retrovirus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors are employed by Advarra, a for-profit entity providing independent IBC and IRB reviews.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Framework to assess the risk of GT-related delayed adverse events and need for LTFU. The decision tree outlines the FDA's risk assessment process for determining whether a GT product may result in delayed adverse events. LTFU is indicated for GT products deemed to pose a risk of delayed adverse events. Adapted from the FDA guidance, “Long-Term Follow-Up After Administration of Human Gene Therapy Protocols: Guidance for Industry.” FDA, Food and Drug Administration; GT, gene therapy; LTFU, long-term follow-up.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eisenman D. The United States' regulatory environment is evolving to accommodate a coming boom in gene therapy research. Appl Biosaf 2019;24(3):147–152; doi: org/10.1177/1535676019854866. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eisenman D, Debold S, Riddle J. A changing world in gene therapy research: Exciting opportunities for medical advancement and biosafety challenges. Appl Biosaf 2021;26(4):179–192; doi: org/10.1089/apb.2021.0020. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marshall E. 1999. Gene therapy death prompts review of adenovirus vector. Science 1999;286(5448):2244–2245; doi: 10.1126/science.286.5448.2244. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stolberg SG. The biotech death of Jesse Gelsinger. New York Times Magazine, Nov 28, 1999, Section 6: 137–150. - PubMed
    1. Wilson JM. Lessons learned from the gene therapy trial for ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency. Mol Genet Metab 2009;96(4):151–157; doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2008.12.016. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources