Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 28;4(4):100478.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100478. eCollection 2023 Apr.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Monoclonal Antibody Socazolimab With Carboplatin and Etoposide for Extensive-Stage SCLC: Results From the Phase 1b Clinical Trial

Affiliations

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Monoclonal Antibody Socazolimab With Carboplatin and Etoposide for Extensive-Stage SCLC: Results From the Phase 1b Clinical Trial

Shun Lu et al. JTO Clin Res Rep. .

Abstract

Introduction: The study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04346914) is an open label, single-arm, phase 1b clinical trial investigating the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the recombinant human anti-programmed death-ligand 1 monoclonal antibody socazolimab in combination with carboplatin and etoposide in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage SCLC. Good safety and efficacy were found in previous phase 1 clinical trials of other cancers, such as cervix cancer.

Methods: Patients received socazolimab (5 mg/kg) every three weeks until disease progression or physician decision. Carboplatin (area under the curve: 5) was also administered every three weeks and etoposide (100 mg/m2) on days 1, 2, and 3 of the treatment cycle. The primary purpose of the study was safety measured by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Secondary purposes included objective response rate, progression-free survival, duration of response, and overall survival.

Results: From April 15, 2020 (enrollment date), to December 30, 2021 (data cutoff), 20 patients with extensive-stage SCLC were administered with socazolimab, carboplatin, and etoposide. Objective response rate was 70.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 45.72%-88.11%). Median progression-free survival was 5.65 months (95% CI: 4.14-6.54), and the median duration of response was 4.29 months (95% CI: 2.76-5.85). Median overall survival was 14.88 months (95% CI: 10.09-not evaluated). The highest incidence of treatment-related adverse events included anemia (100%), decreased neutrophil count (95%), decreased platelet count (95%), and decreased white blood cell count (95%), which occurred during combination therapy. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (90%), decreased white blood cell count (65%), decreased platelet count (50%), and anemia (30%), which were also common adverse reactions of chemotherapy. No adverse events leading to death had occurred.

Conclusions: Results revealed that the combination therapy of socazolimab, carboplatin, and etoposide had preliminarily confirmed the safety of socazolimab in the first-line treatment of SCLC combined with EC chemotherapy. Currently, a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04878016) is being conducted with 498 patients.

Keywords: Carboplatin; Etoposide; Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC); PD-L1; Socazolimab.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition. HBV, hepatitis B virus.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Change of tumor burden from baseline (investigator assessed; n = 20). Bar length is decrease or increase in target lesion size. Bar color is best overall response. (B) Change from baseline over time (investigator assessed; n = 20) for each individual. (C) Treatment exposure and response duration (by RECIST version 1.1; investigator assessed; n = 20). The length of each bar corresponds to the duration of treatment. Response symbols represent time to first report and not best overall. CR, complete response; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; SD, stable disease.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Kaplan-Meier curve for patient progression-free survival (full analysis set). (B) Kaplan-Meier curve for overall survival (full analysis set). EC, etoposide and carboplatin.

References

    1. Howlader N., Noone A.M., Krapcho M., et al. SEER cancer statistics review (CSR), 1975–2014. National Cancer Institute. Accessed May 2, 2020. https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2014
    1. Govindan R., Page N., Morgensztern D., et al. Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4539–4544. - PubMed
    1. Jett J.R., Schild S.E., Kesler K.A., Kalemkerian G.P. Treatment of small cell lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer. 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013;143(suppl):e400S–e419S. - PubMed
    1. Evans W.K., Shepherd F.A., Feld R., Osoba D., Dang P., Deboer G. VP-16 and cisplatin as first-line therapy for small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1985;3:1471–1477. - PubMed
    1. Schiller J.H., Adak S., Cella D., DeVore R.F., Johnson D.H. Topotecan versus observation after cisplatin plus etoposide in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: E7593—a phase III trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:2114–2122. - PubMed

Associated data