Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Mar;8(1):117-124.
doi: 10.1177/23969873221131635. Epub 2022 Oct 29.

Thrombolysis after dabigatran reversal: A nation-wide Italian multicentre study, systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Thrombolysis after dabigatran reversal: A nation-wide Italian multicentre study, systematic review and meta-analysis

Michele Romoli et al. Eur Stroke J. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: Recent anticoagulant intake represents a contraindication for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Idarucizumab reverses the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran, potentially allowing for thrombolysis. This nation-wide observational cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of thrombolysis preceded by dabigatran-reversal in people with acute ischemic stroke.

Patients and methods: We recruited people undergoing thrombolysis following dabigatran-reversal at 17 stroke centers in Italy (reversal-group), people on dabigatran treated with thrombolysis without reversal (no-reversal group), and age, sex, hypertension, stroke severity, and reperfusion treatment-matched controls in 1:7 ratio (control-group). We compared groups for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH, main outcome), any brain hemorrhage, good functional outcome (mRS 0-2 at 3 months), and death. The systematic review followed a predefined protocol (CRD42017060274), and odds ratio (OR) meta-analysis was implemented to compare groups.

Results: Thirty-nine patients in dabigatran-reversal group and 300 matched controls were included. Reversal was associated with a non-significant increase in sICH (10.3% vs 6%, aOR = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.39-4.52), death (17.9% vs 10%, aOR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.12-4.93) and good functional outcome (64.1% vs 52.8%, aOR = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.63-3.19). No hemorrhagic events or deaths were registered in no-reversal group (n = 12). Pooling data from 3 studies after systematic review (n = 1879), reversal carried a non-significant trend for sICH (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.67-3.50), death (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.73-3.24) and good functional outcome (OR = 2.46, 95% CI = 0.85-7.16).

Discussion and conclusion: People treated with reperfusion strategies after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab seem to have a marginal increase in the risk of sICH but comparable functional recovery to matched patients with stroke. Further studies are needed to define treatment cost-effectiveness and potential thresholds in plasma dabigatran concentration for reversal.

Keywords: Stroke; antidote; direct oral anticoagulants; thrombectomy; thrombolysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors have no conflict of interest related to this work. Relevant disclosures outside the submitted work: MP received honoraria from Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, and Pfizer. VC received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and Daiichi Sankyo, and Pfizer. SS reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Allergan, Abbott, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Teva, Bayer, Pfizer, Medtronic, Starmed, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Daiichi Sankyo. SR reports nonfinancial support from Bayer. AZ declares consulting fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Alexion and CLS Behring, and declares grant from the Italian Ministry of Health as principal investigator for clinical trial (RF-2019-12370834). DT reports fees for advisory board and speaker honoraria from Abbott, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, and Pfizer. All other authors have nothing to declare.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Pooled risk estimate for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), good functional outcome and death for dabigatran reversal versus control group.

References

    1. Seiffge DJ, De Marchis GM, Koga M, et al.. Ischemic stroke despite oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation Ann Neurol 2020; 87: 677–687. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pollack CV, Reilly PA, van Ryn J, et al.. Idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal — full cohort analysis. New Engl J Med 2017; 377: 431–441. - PubMed
    1. Giannandrea D, Caponi C, Mengoni A, et al.. Intravenous thrombolysis in stroke after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab: case series and systematic review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2019; 90: 619–623. - PubMed
    1. Barber PA, Wu TY, Ranta A. Stroke reperfusion therapy following dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab in a national cohort. Neurology 2020; 94: e1968–e1972. - PubMed
    1. Kermer P, Eschenfelder CC, Diener HC, et al.. Antagonizing dabigatran by idarucizumab in cases of ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage in Germany—updated series of 120 cases. Int J Stroke 2020; 15: 609–618. - PubMed

MeSH terms