The Patient Voice: Stent Experiences After Ureteroscopy-Insights from In-Depth Interviews with Participants in the USDRN STENTS Nested Qualitative Cohort Study
- PMID: 37021358
- PMCID: PMC10280172
- DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0810
The Patient Voice: Stent Experiences After Ureteroscopy-Insights from In-Depth Interviews with Participants in the USDRN STENTS Nested Qualitative Cohort Study
Abstract
Purpose: Ureteral stents are commonly used after ureteroscopy and cause significant discomfort, yet qualitative perspectives on patients' stent experiences remain unknown. We describe psychological, functional, and interpersonal effects of post-ureteroscopy stents and whether additional patient-reported assessments may be needed. Materials and Methods: Using a qualitative descriptive study design, we conducted in-depth interviews with a nested cohort of participants in the STudy to Enhance uNderstanding of sTent-associated Symptoms (STENTS). Participants shared their symptoms with a post-ureteroscopy stent and described symptom bother and impact on daily activities. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using applied thematic analysis. During analysis, participants' experiences with interference in daily activities were categorized into three groups based on their impact: minimal, moderate, and substantial. Results: All 39 participants experienced pain, although descriptions varied and differentiated between feelings of pain vs discomfort. Almost all experienced urinary symptoms. Only a few reported other physical symptoms, although several psychological aspects were identified. In the areas of sleep, mood, life enjoyment, work, exercise, activities of daily living, driving, childcare, and leisure/social activities, the stent had little impact on daily living among participants placed in the minimal group (n = 12) and far greater impact for participants in the substantial group (n = 8). For patients in the moderate group (n = 19), some daily activities were moderately or substantially affected, whereas other activities were minimally affected. Conclusions: Counseling to better prepare patients for the impact of stent-associated symptoms may help mitigate symptom burden. While existing instruments adequately cover most symptoms, additional assessments for other domains, particularly psychological factors, may be needed.
Keywords: qualitative research; quality of life; ureteral stent; ureteroscopy; urinary stone disease.
Conflict of interest statement
No competing financial interests exist.
References
-
- Assimos DG, Krambeck AE, Miller NL, et al. Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline. 2016. Available from: www.auanet.org/guidelines/kidney-stones-surgical-managementguideline [Last accessed: May 17, 2022].
-
- Turk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, et al. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. 2020. Available from: uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis/chapter/introduction [Last accessed: May 16, 2023].
-
- Joshi HB, Newns N, Stainthorpe A, et al. . Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire: Development and validation of a multidimensional quality of life measure. J Urol 2003;169:1060–1064. - PubMed
-
- Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 2000;23:334–340. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources