Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 6;55(3):152.
doi: 10.1007/s11250-023-03570-y.

Performance of Pantaneira breed cows in precision grazing system

Affiliations

Performance of Pantaneira breed cows in precision grazing system

Evellyn Richelly Ferreira da Silva et al. Trop Anim Health Prod. .

Abstract

Use of a grazing system that takes into account the ingestive behavior of animals and the physiological characteristics of plants maximizes land use and promotes positive effects on the environment. In this sense, the objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of Pantaneira breed cows, kept in rotated grazing in Mombasa grass (Megathyrsus maximum), with different grazing times. Fifty animals were divided into two treatments: Continuous T1: 24 h and T2-Inverted: 12 h. The experiment lasted 98 days, being determined the production and nutritional quality of the forage, digestibility, intake, and performance of the animals. The design was randomized blocks at 5% probability, with the means compared by the F test. The design used was completely randomized at 5% probability by the T test. There was no significant difference for biomass production (P > 0.05). However, after grazing the Inverted group, the forage showed a lower percentage of leaves and an increase in neutral detergent fiber and acid contents and total carbohydrates, and a reduction in crude protein and ether extract values, as well as a higher digestibility (P < 0.05). The animals of the Continuous group intaked more forage (P < 0.05). The Inverted group had a higher average daily weight gain, in addition to a lower feed conversion (P < 0.001). The animals in the Control group spent more time eating (P < 0.0001) and sleeping (P < 0.0001), while the animals of the Inverted group spent more time in idleness (P < 0.0001) and interacting (P < 0.05). There was no difference in rumination time between treatments (P > 0.05). It was concluded that Inverted grazing improved the quality of Mombasa grass and the performance of cows.

Keywords: Ethology; Inverted grazing; Precision management; Rational pasture technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Albright, J.L., 1993. Feeding behavior of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 76, 485–498. - DOI
    1. Avondo, M., Bonanno, A., Pagano, R.I., Valenti, B., Grigoli, A.D., Luigia Alicata, M., Galofaro, V., Pennisi, P., 2008. Milk quality as affected by grazing time of day in Mediterranean goats. Journal of Dairy Research, 75, 48–54. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bohnert, D.W., Stephenson, M.B., 2016. Supplementation and sustainable grazing systems. Journal of Animal Science, 94, 15–25. - DOI
    1. Craig, E.A., Weismann, J.S., Horwich, A.L., 1994. Heat shock proteins and molecular chaperones: mediators of protein conformation and turnover in the cell. Cell, 78, 365–372. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Detmann, E., Queiroz, A.C., Cecon, P.R., Paulino, M.F., Filho, S.C.V., Cabral, L.S., Lana, R.P., 2003. Consumption of neutral detergent fiber by cattle in feedlot. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 32, 1763–1777. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources