Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 6;18(4):e0284056.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284056. eCollection 2023.

Characterizing subgroups of sexual behaviors among men who have sex with men eligible for, but not using, PrEP in the Netherlands

Affiliations

Characterizing subgroups of sexual behaviors among men who have sex with men eligible for, but not using, PrEP in the Netherlands

Feline de la Court et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

This study identified subgroups of sexual behaviors associated with increased STI/HIV risk among those eligible for but not using pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in order to improve PrEP uptake and prioritization in the context of restricted capacity. We used data from sexual health centers (SHCs) in the Netherlands, including all visits of eligible but non-PrEP using men who have sex with men (MSM), men who have sex with men and women (MSMW) and transgender persons between July 2019 (start of the Dutch national PrEP pilot (NPP)) and June 2021. Using latent class analysis (LCA), we identified classes of sexual behaviors (number of partners, chemsex, group sex and sex work) and explored whether these classes were associated with STI diagnosis and sociodemographics. Across 45,582 visits of 14,588 eligible non-PrEP using individuals, the best fitting LCA model contained three classes of sexual behaviors. Classes were distinguished by seldomly reported sexual behaviors (class 1; 53.5%, n = 24,383), the highest proportions of ≥6 partners and group sex (class 2; 29.8%, n = 13,596), and the highest proportions of chemsex and sex work (class 3; 16.7% of visits, n = 7,603). Visits in classes 2 and 3 (vs. class 1) were significantly more often with individuals who were diagnosed with an STI, older (≥36 vs. ≤35 years), MSMW (vs. MSM), and visiting an urban (vs. non-urban) SHC; while these visits were significantly less often with individuals from an STI/HIV endemic area. The percentage of visits at which an STI was diagnosed was 17.07% (n = 4,163) in class 1, 19.53% (n = 2,655) in class 2 and 25.25% (n = 1,920) in class 3. The highest risk of STI, and thereby HIV, was in those engaging in specific subgroups of sexual behavior characterized by frequently reporting multiple partners, group sex, sex work or chemsex. PrEP uptake should be encouraged and prioritized for these individuals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MP obtained unrestricted research grants and speaker/ advisory fees from Gilead Sciences, Abbvie and MSD; all of which were paid to her institute and were unrelated to the current work. EH obtained unrestricted research grants from Gilead Sciences, which were paid to her institute and were unrelated to the current work. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Sexual behavior associated with increased STI risk across three latent classes.
Explanation of data: Bars represent the mean proportion of visits reporting each sexual behavior respectively for class 1, 2 and 3. All sexual behaviors refer to the six months prior to the visit. Number (= No.) of sexual partners refers to those with ≥6 sexual partners in the six months prior to the visit. Chemsex was defined as using cocaine, ketamine, mephedrone, gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), gamma-butyrolactone (GBL), and/or crystal meth around or during sex. Bands at the top of each bar represent 95% confidence intervals, which were calculated using the delta method.

Similar articles

References

    1. Celum C, Baeten J. PrEP for HIV Prevention: Evidence, Global Scale-up, and Emerging Options. Cell Host & Microbe. 2020;27(4):502–6. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.03.020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bierman W, Hoornenborg E, Nellen J, Janssens F, Burger D, Hermanussen R, et al. Nederlandse multidisciplinaire richtlijn Pre-expositie profylaxe (PrEP) ter preventie van hiv (update 2022) 2022. https://www.soaaids.nl/files/2022-07/20220711-PrEP-richtlijn-Nederland-v....
    1. van Wees D, Visser M, van Aar F, de Coul EO, Staritsky L, Sarink D, et al. Sexually transmitted infections in the Netherlands in 2021. RIVM rapport 2022–0023. 2022.
    1. Armstrong HL, Roth EA, Rich A, Lachowsky NJ, Cui Z, Sereda P, et al.. Associations between sexual partner number and HIV risk behaviors: implications for HIV prevention efforts in a Treatment as Prevention (TasP) environment. AIDS care. 2018;30(10):1290–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maxwell S, Shahmanesh M, Gafos M. Chemsex behaviours among men who have sex with men: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2019;63:74–89. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.11.014 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types