Endoscopic management of encrusted ureteral stents: outcomes and tips and tricks
- PMID: 37024556
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04361-8
Endoscopic management of encrusted ureteral stents: outcomes and tips and tricks
Abstract
Purpose: To report our experience in the management of encrusted ureteral stents (EUS) and provide technical insight of our endourological approaches for difficult scenarios posed by this entity.
Materials and methods: A retrospective evaluation of a longitudinally collected database of 58 patients with encrusted US between December 2012 and May 2022 was performed. The ureteral stents were initially inserted due to obstructive uropathy, pyelonephritis or after a successful endoscopic procedure for urolithiasis. A combination of antegrade/retrograde treatment in single or multiple sessions took place for the retrieval of the encrusted stents. Non-contrast enhanced computer tomography was used for the follow-up of the patients at 1-month after the removal of the encrusted stent.
Results: Overall 58 patients, 39 males and 19 females with a median age of 51 years old were included in the study. Indwelling time was < 6 months, 6-12 months and > 12 months in 22%, 57% and 21% of the cases, respectively. All US were successfully removed. Semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS) and flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) were used in 90% of the cases. In 10% of the cases, a second-stage percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) was performed. All US were successfully released. Stone-free rate was 84% at 1-month. Overall complication rate was 10.5% (mostly postoperative fevers, 5.4%).
Conclusion: Removal of the encrusted US is a challenging procedure. Appropriate decision-making and knowledge of specific tricks may result in safe and successful management of significant EUS.
Keywords: Encrusted stent; Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery; Forgotten ureteral stents; Management of ureteral stents; Ureterorenoscopy.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Rana AM, Sabooh A (2007) Management strategies and results for severely encrusted retained ureteral stents. J Endourol 21(6):628–632. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.0250 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, Yoshida M, Matsuzaki J (2012) Ureteral stent encrustation, incrustation, and coloring: morbidity related to indwelling times. J Endourol 26(2):178–182. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0385 - DOI - PubMed
-
- El-Faqih SR, Shamsuddin AB, Chakrabarti A, Atassi R, Kardar AH, Osman MK et al (1991) Polyurethane internal ureteral stents in treatment of stone patients: morbidity related to indwelling times. J Urol 146(6):1487–1491. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38146-6 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Polat H, Yucel MO, Utangac MM, Benlioglu C, Gok A, Cift A et al (2017) Management of forgotten ureteral stents: relationship between indwelling time and required treatment approaches. Balkan Med J 34(4):301–307. https://doi.org/10.4274/balkanmedj.2015.1562 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Vanderbrink BA, Rastinehad AR, Ost MC, Smith AD (2008) Encrusted urinary stents: evaluation and endourologic management. J Endourol 22(5):905–912. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.0382 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources