Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;41(5):1415-1421.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04361-8. Epub 2023 Apr 6.

Endoscopic management of encrusted ureteral stents: outcomes and tips and tricks

Affiliations

Endoscopic management of encrusted ureteral stents: outcomes and tips and tricks

Arman Tsaturyan et al. World J Urol. 2023 May.

Abstract

Purpose: To report our experience in the management of encrusted ureteral stents (EUS) and provide technical insight of our endourological approaches for difficult scenarios posed by this entity.

Materials and methods: A retrospective evaluation of a longitudinally collected database of 58 patients with encrusted US between December 2012 and May 2022 was performed. The ureteral stents were initially inserted due to obstructive uropathy, pyelonephritis or after a successful endoscopic procedure for urolithiasis. A combination of antegrade/retrograde treatment in single or multiple sessions took place for the retrieval of the encrusted stents. Non-contrast enhanced computer tomography was used for the follow-up of the patients at 1-month after the removal of the encrusted stent.

Results: Overall 58 patients, 39 males and 19 females with a median age of 51 years old were included in the study. Indwelling time was < 6 months, 6-12 months and > 12 months in 22%, 57% and 21% of the cases, respectively. All US were successfully removed. Semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS) and flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) were used in 90% of the cases. In 10% of the cases, a second-stage percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) was performed. All US were successfully released. Stone-free rate was 84% at 1-month. Overall complication rate was 10.5% (mostly postoperative fevers, 5.4%).

Conclusion: Removal of the encrusted US is a challenging procedure. Appropriate decision-making and knowledge of specific tricks may result in safe and successful management of significant EUS.

Keywords: Encrusted stent; Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery; Forgotten ureteral stents; Management of ureteral stents; Ureterorenoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rana AM, Sabooh A (2007) Management strategies and results for severely encrusted retained ureteral stents. J Endourol 21(6):628–632. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.0250 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, Yoshida M, Matsuzaki J (2012) Ureteral stent encrustation, incrustation, and coloring: morbidity related to indwelling times. J Endourol 26(2):178–182. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0385 - DOI - PubMed
    1. El-Faqih SR, Shamsuddin AB, Chakrabarti A, Atassi R, Kardar AH, Osman MK et al (1991) Polyurethane internal ureteral stents in treatment of stone patients: morbidity related to indwelling times. J Urol 146(6):1487–1491. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38146-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Polat H, Yucel MO, Utangac MM, Benlioglu C, Gok A, Cift A et al (2017) Management of forgotten ureteral stents: relationship between indwelling time and required treatment approaches. Balkan Med J 34(4):301–307. https://doi.org/10.4274/balkanmedj.2015.1562 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Vanderbrink BA, Rastinehad AR, Ost MC, Smith AD (2008) Encrusted urinary stents: evaluation and endourologic management. J Endourol 22(5):905–912. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.0382 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources