Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 7;14(1):60.
doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01403-y.

Diagnostic reference level quantities for adult chest and abdomen-pelvis CT examinations: correlation with organ doses

Paulo Roberto Costa  1 , Alessandra Tomal  2 , Jullianna Cristina de Oliveira Castro  3 , Isabella Paziam Fernandes Nunes  3 , Denise Yanikian Nersissian  4 , Márcio Valente Yamada Sawamura  5 , Hilton Leão Filho  5 , Choonsik Lee  6
Affiliations

Diagnostic reference level quantities for adult chest and abdomen-pelvis CT examinations: correlation with organ doses

Paulo Roberto Costa et al. Insights Imaging. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate correlations between DRL quantities (DRLq) stratified into patient size groups for non-contrast chest and abdomen-pelvis CT examinations in adult patients and the corresponding organ doses.

Methods: This study presents correlations between DRLq (CTDIvol, DLP and SSDE) stratified into patient size ranges and corresponding organ doses shared in four groups: inside, peripheral, distributed and outside. The demographic, technical and dosimetric parameters were used to identify the influence of these quantities in organ doses. A robust statistical method was implemented in order to establish these correlations and its statistical significance.

Results: Median values of the grouped organ doses are presented according to the effective diameter ranges. Organ doses in the regions inside the imaged area are higher than the organ doses in peripheral, distributed and outside regions, excepted to the peripheral doses associated with chest examinations. Different levels of statistical significance between organ doses and the DRLq were presented.

Conclusions: Correlations between DRLq and target-organ doses associated with clinical practice can support guidance's to the establishment of optimization criteria. SSDE demonstrated to be significant in the evaluation of organ doses is also highlighted. The proposed model allows the design of optimization actions with specific risk-reduction results.

Keywords: Abdomen-pelvis; Chest; Computed tomography; Organ doses; Statistics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Box-plots representing the distributions of the organ dose groups: a IO, b PO, c DO and d OO, according to the effective diameter group ranges for abdomen-pelvis examinations
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Box-plots representing the distributions of the organ dose groups: a IO, b PO, c DO and d OO, according to the effective diameter group ranges for chest examinations
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Abdomen-pelvis organ dose groups as functions of the SSDE ((a) Inside, (c) Periphery, (e) Outside and (g) Distributed) and d  ((b) Inside, (d) Periphery, (f) Outside and (h) Distributed). The magenta lines correspond to the fittings using Eq. (2) considering the contributions of patients imaged in all CT scanners. The blue band refers to a range of ± 20% around this average line. The dots identify each CT scanner used in the study
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Chest organ dose groups as functions of the SSDE ((a) Inside, (c) Periphery, (e) Outside and (g) Distributed) and d ((b) Inside, (d) Periphery, (f) Outside and (h) Distributed). The magenta lines correspond to the fittings using Eq. 2 considering the contributions of patients imaged in all CT scanners. The blue band refers to a range of ± 20% around this average line. The dots identify each CT scanner used in the study
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Samei E, Järvinen H, Kortesniemi M, et al. Medical imaging dose optimisation from ground up: expert opinion of an international summit. J Radiol Prot. 2018;38:967–989. doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/aac575. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kanal KM, Butler PF, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Coombs LP, Morin RLUS. Diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT examinations. Radiology. 2017;284:120–133. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161911. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shrimpton PC, Wall BF, Hillier MC (1989) Suggested guideline doses for medical x-ray examinations. United Kingdom: Inst Phys
    1. ICRP (1996) Radiological protection and safety in medicine. In: ICRP publication 73: international radiological protection commission - PubMed
    1. ICRP (2017) Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. In: ICRP publication 135 international radiation protection commission

LinkOut - more resources