Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 6;18(1):10.
doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01266-3.

Developing a typology of network alteration strategies for implementation: a scoping review and iterative synthesis

Alicia C Bunger  1 , Reza Yousefi-Nooraie  2 , Keith Warren  3 , Qiuchang Cao  4 , Porooshat Dadgostar  2 , Tatiana E Bustos  5
Affiliations

Developing a typology of network alteration strategies for implementation: a scoping review and iterative synthesis

Alicia C Bunger et al. Implement Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Social networks transmit knowledge, influence, and resources. These relationships among patients, professionals, and organizations can shape how innovations are disseminated, adopted, implemented, and sustained. Network alteration interventions-interventions that change or rewire social networks-have the potential to be used as implementation strategies. Yet, the types, mechanisms, and effectiveness of these interventions for implementation are unclear. This scoping review and iterative synthesis identified and described network alteration strategies that could be tested for implementation.

Methods: We used forward and backward citation tracking of influential articles on network interventions, bibliometric searches, and hand searches of peer-reviewed social network journals. At least two team members screened article titles/abstracts to identify studies that met inclusion criteria: empirical studies of an intervention, the intervention was designed to alter some element of a social network, and changes in social network metrics were measured at two or more time points. During full-text reviews, information about the network interventions, actors, ties, and main findings was extracted. Reporting was informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). To develop our typology, we synthesized these results using an iterative team-based and consensus-building process.

Results: Fifty-three articles met the inclusion criteria. The interventions described were conducted in healthcare systems or behavioral health systems (34%), communities (26.4%), and schools (22.6%). The majority included records describing interventions designed to alter social support, information-sharing, or friendship networks (65%) among individual actors (84.9%), or to increase ties. Eight strategies emerged. Three strategies targeted the general context: (1) change the environment, (2) create groups, and (3) change the composition. Four strategies targeted individual actors: change (4) motivations, (5) skills for networking, (6) knowledge of one's social network, and (7) prominence/roles. One strategy (8) targeted specific ties within the network (targeting a particular pair-wise relationship or changing the nature of an existing tie).

Conclusion: The network alteration strategies in this typology provide further operational specificity for how implementation strategies target relationships. Advancing these strategies will require greater theoretical specification, the development of strategies that target professionals and organizations, and studies that examine the impact on implementation outcomes.

Keywords: Implementation strategies; Network interventions; Social networks; Specification; Typology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Search terms
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PRISMA diagram
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Network alteration strategies
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Valente TW, Palinkas LA, Czaja S, Chu KH, Brown CH. Social network analysis for program implementation. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0131712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131712. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Valente TW. Social networks and health: models, methods, and applications. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.
    1. Valente TW. Network models of the diffusion of innovations. Cresskill, N.J: Hampton Press; 1995. p. 171.
    1. Bartley L, Metz A, Fleming WO. What implementation strategies are relational? Using Relational Theory to explore the ERIC implementation strategies. Front Health Serv. 2022;2:913585. 10.3389/frhs.2022.913585. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Powell BJ, McMillen JC, Proctor EK, Carpenter CR, Griffey RT, Bunger AC, et al. A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Med Care Res Rev. 2012;69(2):123–157. doi: 10.1177/1077558711430690. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources