Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 3;5(4):e0884.
doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000884. eCollection 2023 Apr.

Measures for the Core Outcome Set for Research Evaluating Interventions to Prevent and/or Treat Delirium in Critically Ill Adults: An International Consensus Study (Del-COrS)

Louise Rose  1 , Bronagh Blackwood  2 , Dale M Needham  3 , John W Devlin  4   5 , Mike Clarke  6 , Lisa D Burry  7   8
Affiliations

Measures for the Core Outcome Set for Research Evaluating Interventions to Prevent and/or Treat Delirium in Critically Ill Adults: An International Consensus Study (Del-COrS)

Louise Rose et al. Crit Care Explor. .

Abstract

To gain consensus on measurement methods for outcomes (delirium occurrence, severity, time to resolution, mortality, health-related quality of life [HrQoL], emotional distress including anxiety, depression, acute stress, and post-traumatic stress disorder, and cognition) of our Core Outcome Set (COS) for trials of interventions to prevent and/or treat delirium in critically ill adults.

Design: International consensus process.

Setting: Three virtual meetings (April 2021).

Patients/subjects: Critical illness survivors/family, clinicians, and researchers from six Countries.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Measures (selected based on instrument validity, existing recommendations, and feasibility) and measurement time horizons were discussed. Participants voted on instruments and measurement timing (a priori consensus threshold ≥ 70%). Eighteen stakeholders (28% ICU survivors/family members) participated. We achieved consensus on the Confusion Assessment Method-ICU or Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist to measure delirium occurrence and delirium resolution (100%), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for emotional distress (71%), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Blind for cognition (83%). We did not achieve consensus on EQ-5D five-level for HrQoL (69%) or its measurement at 6 months. We also did not achieve consensus on the Impact of Event Scale (IES)-Revised or IES-6 for post-traumatic stress (65%) or on measurement instruments for delirium severity incorporating delirium-related emotional distress. We were unable to gain consensus on when to commence and when to discontinue assessing for delirium occurrence and time to resolution, when to determine mortality. We gained consensus that emotional distress and cognition should be measured up to 12 months from hospital discharge.

Conclusions: Consensus was reached on measurement instruments for four of seven outcomes in the COS for delirium prevention or treatment trials for critically ill adults. Further work is required to validate instruments for delirium severity that include delirium-related emotional distress.

Keywords: clinical trials; core outcome set; critical care; delirium; intensive care; outcome measure instruments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

  • Long-term outcomes with haloperidol versus placebo in acutely admitted adult ICU patients with delirium.
    Mortensen CB, Andersen-Ranberg NC, Poulsen LM, Granholm A, Rasmussen BS, Kjær MN, Lange T, Ebdrup BH, Collet MO, Andreasen AS, Bestle MH, Uslu B, Pedersen HS, Nielsen LG, Hästbacka J, Jensen TB, Damgaard K, Sommer T, Morgen M, Dey N, Citerio G, Estrup S, Egerod I, Samuelson K, Perner A, Mathiesen O. Mortensen CB, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jan;50(1):103-113. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07282-7. Epub 2024 Jan 3. Intensive Care Med. 2024. PMID: 38170227 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
  • Instruments to assess post-intensive care syndrome assessment: a scoping review and modified Delphi method study.
    Nakanishi N, Liu K, Kawauchi A, Okamura M, Tanaka K, Katayama S, Mitani Y, Ota K, Taito S, Fudeyasu K, Masuka Y, Yoshihiro S, Utsumi S, Nishikimi M, Masuda M, Iida Y, Kawai Y, Hatakeyama J, Hifumi T, Unoki T, Kawakami D, Obata K, Katsukawa H, Sumita H, Morisawa T, Takahashi M, Tsuboi N, Kozu R, Takaki S, Haruna J, Fujinami Y, Nosaka N, Miyamoto K, Nakamura K, Kondo Y, Inoue S, Nishida O. Nakanishi N, et al. Crit Care. 2023 Nov 7;27(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04681-6. Crit Care. 2023. PMID: 37936249 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Williamson P, Altman D, Blazeby J, et al. : Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: Issues to consider. Trials 2012; 13:132. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salluh JI, Wang H, Schneider EB, et al. : Outcome of delirium in critically ill patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2015; 350:h2538. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pisani MA, Ferrante L: Among patients admitted to ICU, delirium is most common in those with neurological diagnoses, and is associated with adverse health outcomes. Evid Based Nurs 2013; 16:81–82 - PubMed
    1. Pandharipande P, Ely E, Arora R, et al. : The intensive care delirium research agenda: A multinational, interprofessional perspective. Intensive Care Med 2017; 43:1329–1339 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williamson P, Altman D, Bagley H, et al. : The COMET handbook: Version 1.0. Trials 2017; 18:280. - PMC - PubMed