Robotic Sacrocolpopexy with Autologous Fascia Lata: A Case Series
- PMID: 37025435
- PMCID: PMC10071871
- DOI: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_7_22
Robotic Sacrocolpopexy with Autologous Fascia Lata: A Case Series
Abstract
Objectives: Apical prolapse involves the upper vagina or vaginal vault after hysterectomy. Treatment is indicated for symptomatic women, and surgical approach is considered for women who failed or refused conservative therapy. We performed 10 pickups of autologous fascia, used for robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSCP).
Materials and methods: We included patients between 60 and 80 years old who showed a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-q) over the second stage and with symptoms related to prolapse.
Results: All of them underwent autologous fascia lata (AFL) pickup from the right leg and after to RSCP. One patient underwent also posterior colporrhaphy. The mean intraoperative time was 199.2 min (183-230 min). No intra-operatory complications were reported. POP-q assessment during follow-up showed improvements: C point gained on average 7.6 points (5-8) and mean values went from -0.6 to - 8.2 cm (-7 to -9 cm). The three women who had anterior compartment defects shows good anatomical reconstitution with a mean Aa and Ba value of - 2.83 cm (-2.5 to -3 cm) and gained 4 points (average gain: 3.5-4.5 cm). Total vaginal lenght (TVL).
Conclusion: According to these data, in our experience, AFL employment showed a good anatomical result from the first to last follow-up.
Keywords: Fascia lata; graft; mesh; prolapse recurrence.
Copyright: © 2023 Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Total Autologous Fascia Lata Sacrocolpopexy for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Experience in Thirty-Four Patients.Urology. 2022 Dec;170:73-77. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.038. Epub 2022 Sep 15. Urology. 2022. PMID: 36115434
-
Robotic Sacral Colpopexy Using Autologous Fascia Lata Compared with Mesh.J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):801-807. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0537. Epub 2020 Nov 26. J Endourol. 2021. PMID: 33107334
-
Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy with Autologous Fascia Lata.Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Apr;36(4):929-931. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-06010-z. Epub 2024 Dec 28. Int Urogynecol J. 2025. PMID: 39731627
-
Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021 Apr;43(4):511-523.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Feb 3. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021. PMID: 33548503
-
[Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: guidelines for clinical practice].Prog Urol. 2016 Jul;26 Suppl 1:S27-37. doi: 10.1016/S1166-7087(16)30426-2. Prog Urol. 2016. PMID: 27595624 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes between the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System and da Vinci® Xi in Robot-assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2025 May 22;14(2):132-136. doi: 10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-24-00018. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2025. PMID: 40521581 Free PMC article.
-
Narrative review of flaps and grafts in robotic reconstructive urologic surgery.Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg. 2024 Jan 30;9:5. doi: 10.21037/ales-23-36. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg. 2024. PMID: 38938988 Free PMC article.
-
Medium Term Outcomes for Robotic Sacral Colpopexy With Autologous Fascia Lata.Neurourol Urodyn. 2025 Aug;44(6):1339-1343. doi: 10.1002/nau.70094. Epub 2025 Jun 27. Neurourol Urodyn. 2025. PMID: 40575932 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility and Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy Using Autologous Round Ligament Grafts: A Novel Non-Mesh Surgical Approach for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 9;61(7):1242. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071242. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40731871 Free PMC article.
-
Sacrocolpopexy: Alternatives to Mesh Grafts.Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jan;36(1):3-10. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05956-4. Epub 2024 Oct 30. Int Urogynecol J. 2025. PMID: 39476292 Review.
References
-
- Cvach K, Dwyer P. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: Abdominal and vaginal approaches. World J Urol. 2012;30:471–7. - PubMed
-
- Okcu NT, Gürbüz T, Uysal G. Comparison of patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation, laparoscopic hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy and abdominal hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy in terms of postoperative quality of life and sexual function. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021;50:101977. - PubMed
-
- Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:1783–90. - PubMed
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Urogynecologic Society. INTERIM UPDATE: This Practice Bulletin is updated as highlighted to reflect the US Food and Drug Administration order to stop the sale of transvaginal synthetic mesh products for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019;25:397–408. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources