Medium-Term Risk of Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse within 2-Year Follow-Up after Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
- PMID: 37025445
- PMCID: PMC10071876
- DOI: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_59_22
Medium-Term Risk of Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse within 2-Year Follow-Up after Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
Abstract
Objective: The present study was performed to determine the risk of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) within 2 years after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) in patients with uterovaginal prolapse.
Materials and methods: A retrospective comparative study was performed in a population of 204 patients over a 2-year follow-up period following LSC with concomitant supracervical hysterectomy or uterine preservation at a single urological clinic between 2015 and 2019. The primary outcome was surgical failure following LSC in cases of POP, focusing on failures occurring before the 2ndyear of follow-up. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the odds ratios (ORs) for surgical failure.
Results: The primary outcome, surgical failure in cases of POP, occurred 2 years after the initial surgery in 19 of the 204 patients (9.3%) (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7% - 14.2%). Surgical failure was most common in the anterior compartment (n = 10, 4.9%), and further surgery was performed in seven of the patients with surgical failure (3.4%). The poor primary outcome was predicted by lysis of adhesions (OR, 7.5, 95% CI, 1.6-33.8, P = 0.008) and preoperative POP stage IV (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.1-10.8, P = 0.03) on multivariable logistic regression analysis.
Conclusion: The overall rate of surgical failure following LSC in our cohort was 9.3% over the 2-year follow-up period after surgery, and preoperative prolapse stage IV was associated with a higher risk of recurrence.
Keywords: Failure; pelvic organ prolapse; preoperative; risk factors.
Copyright: © 2023 Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Jan;34(1):271-278. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05403-2. Epub 2022 Nov 17. Int Urogynecol J. 2023. PMID: 36394632
-
Medium-term outcomes 2 years after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Oct;42(7):3336-3341. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2125293. Epub 2022 Sep 23. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022. PMID: 36149283
-
Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concomitant supracervical hysterectomy or uterine preservation.Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Sep;34(9):2217-2224. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05534-0. Epub 2023 Apr 13. Int Urogynecol J. 2023. PMID: 37052646 Free PMC article.
-
A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.Eur Urol. 2014 Jun;65(6):1128-37. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.064. Epub 2014 Jan 8. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 24433811 Review.
-
Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Feb;33(2):297-308. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04741-x. Epub 2021 Mar 24. Int Urogynecol J. 2022. PMID: 33760992
Cited by
-
Improvement in Quality of Life after Laparoscopic or Robotic-assisted Sacrocolpopexy with a Single Anterior Mesh in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single Institution.Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2024 Jul 18;13(3):168-173. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_19_23. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2024. PMID: 39184259 Free PMC article.
-
Prolapse Quality-of-life Questionnaire is a Reliable Postoperative Outcome Assessment.Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2025 Jul 19;14(3):215-222. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_74_24. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2025. PMID: 40786670 Free PMC article.
-
Device Selection Contributes to Operative Time Reduction in Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2025 Mar 15;14(2):157-164. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_155_23. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2025. PMID: 40521574 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical Outcomes and Feasibility of Transvaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation through Anterior Approach for Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse.J Midlife Health. 2023 Oct-Dec;14(4):280-284. doi: 10.4103/jmh.jmh_224_23. Epub 2024 Feb 23. J Midlife Health. 2023. PMID: 38504730 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative efficacy of bilateral mesh sacrospinous ligament suspension versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in patients with metroptosis.Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 7;14(1):18367. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69221-w. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39112592 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501–6. - PubMed
-
- Whiteside JL, Weber AM, Meyn LA, Walters MD. Risk factors for prolapse recurrence after vaginal repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1533–8. - PubMed
-
- Aslam MF, Osmundsen B, Edwards SR, Matthews C, Gregory WT. Preoperative prolapse stage as predictor of failure of sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22:156–60. - PubMed
-
- Bradley MS, Askew AL, Vaughan MH, Kawasaki A, Visco AG. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: Early postoperative outcomes after surgical reduction of enlarged genital hiatus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:514.e1–8. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources