Orthopaedic Surgery Residency: Perspective of Applicants and Program Directors on Medical Student Virtual Experiences
- PMID: 37026743
- PMCID: PMC10082237
- DOI: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00278
Orthopaedic Surgery Residency: Perspective of Applicants and Program Directors on Medical Student Virtual Experiences
Abstract
Introduction: Orthopaedic Residency Directors advised against visiting subinternship rotations in the peak of the pandemic. To adapt, programs offered multiple virtual experiences. The purpose of this study was to evaluate programs and applicants perceptions regarding the value of virtual experiences during the 2020 to 2021 application cycle and their utility in future application cycles.
Methods: A survey was disseminated to 31 residency programs gathering data about virtual experiences offered in this cycle. A second survey was disseminated to interns who have successfully matched at those programs to identify how interns think to have benefited from the experiences.
Results: Twenty-eight programs completed the survey (90% response rate). One hundred eight new interns completed the survey (70% response rate). Virtual information sessions and resident socials were the highest attended (94% and 92%, respectively). Interns and leadership agreed that virtual rotations provided students with a good understanding of program culture and what the programs offer educationally. Neither the leadership nor the interns would recommend replacing in-person aways with virtual experiences.
Conclusion: Virtual experiences helped bridge the gap after away rotations were canceled. Alongside in-person aways, virtual experiences are likely to play a role in future cycles. However, virtual experiences remain incomparable to in-person away rotations and are not recommended as a replacement.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the following authors or any immediate family member has received anything of value from or has stock or stock options held in a commercial company or institution related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article: Dr. Hicks, Dr. Khalafallah, Dr. Wright-Chisem, Dr. Mulcahey, Dr. Levine, Dr. LaPorte, Dr. Patt, and Dr. Kogan.
Figures
References
-
- National Resident Matching Program: Results and Data: 2015 Main Residency Match®.
-
- National Resident Matching Program: Results and Data: 2021 Main Residency Match®.
-
- Karnes JM, Mayerson JL, Scharschmidt TJ: Is orthopedics more competitive today than when my attending matched? An analysis of national resident matching program data for orthopedic PGY1 applicants from 1984 to 2011. J Surg Educ 2014;71:530-542. - PubMed
-
- Trikha R, Keswani A, Ishmael CR, Greig D, Kelley BV, Bernthal NM: Current trends in orthopaedic surgery residency applications and match rates. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020;102:e24. - PubMed
-
- Nasreddine AY, Gallo R: Applying to orthopaedic residency and matching rates: Analysis and review of the past 25 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019;101:e134. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous