Ergonomic Analysis of Otologic Surgery: Comparison of Endoscope and Microscope
- PMID: 37026810
- DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003858
Ergonomic Analysis of Otologic Surgery: Comparison of Endoscope and Microscope
Abstract
Objective: The comparative postural health of surgeons performing endoscopic and microscopic otologic surgeries has been a topic of active debate, with many nascent or anecdotal reports suggesting the latter encourages suboptimal ergonomics. Using inertial body sensors to measure joint angles, this study sought to objectively evaluate and compare the ergonomics of surgeons during endoscopic and microscopic otologic surgeries.
Study design: Prospective pilot trial.
Setting: Large, multicenter, academic hospital system. Performed 21 otologic operations (10 endoscopic and 11 microscopic) in November 2020 and January 2021. All attendings were fellowship trained in otology/neurotology.
Subjects: Eight otolaryngologists (four attendings and four residents) performing 21 otologic surgeries (11 microscopic and 10 endoscopic).
Intervention: Approach to otologic surgery: endoscope or microscope.
Main outcome measures: Surgeons' neck and back angles while wearing ergonomic sensors affixed to either side of each major joint, mental and physical burdens and pain after each surgery (via modified NASA Task Load Index).
Results: Residents' necks (9.54° microscopic vs. -4.79° endoscopic, p = 0.04) and backs (16.48° microscopic vs. 3.66° endoscopic, p = 0.01) were significantly more flexed when performing microscopic surgery than when performing endoscopic surgery, although attending neck and back flexion were comparable during microscopic and endoscopic surgeries. Attendings reported significantly higher pain levels after operating microscopically than after operating endoscopically (0.13 vs. 2.76, p = 0.01).
Conclusions: Residents were found to operate with significantly higher risk back and neck postures (as defined by the validated ergonomic tool, Rapid Entire Body Assessment) when operating microscopically. Attendings reported significantly higher levels of pain after operating microscopically versus endoscopically, suggesting that the suboptimal microscopic postures adopted earlier in training may pose an indelible risk later in a surgeon's career.
Copyright © 2023, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest to report.
Similar articles
-
Intraoperative Neck Angles in Endoscopic and Microscopic Otologic Surgeries.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun;168(6):1494-1501. doi: 10.1002/ohn.226. Epub 2023 Feb 16. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023. PMID: 36794784
-
Ergonomic Analysis of Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Using Novel Inertial Sensors.Laryngoscope. 2022 Jun;132(6):1153-1159. doi: 10.1002/lary.29796. Epub 2021 Aug 6. Laryngoscope. 2022. PMID: 34355793
-
Does "Just in Time" teaching of ergonomic principles improve posture of trainees during otologic microscopic surgery?Am J Otolaryngol. 2023 Jan-Feb;44(1):103682. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103682. Epub 2022 Oct 22. Am J Otolaryngol. 2023. PMID: 36306708 Clinical Trial.
-
Getting Started with Endoscopic Ear Surgery.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2021 Feb;54(1):45-57. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2020.09.009. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2021. PMID: 33243376 Review.
-
Endoscopic ear surgery: a hot topic?J Laryngol Otol. 2017 Feb;131(2):117-122. doi: 10.1017/S0022215116009828. Epub 2017 Jan 10. J Laryngol Otol. 2017. PMID: 28069085 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of neck angle and musculoskeletal discomfort of surgeon in cataract surgery between three-dimensional heads-up display system and conventional microscope.Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 30;14(1):22681. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68630-1. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39349516 Free PMC article.
-
Ergonomic learning curves on gynecological laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery.BMC Surg. 2023 Oct 27;23(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02241-x. BMC Surg. 2023. PMID: 37891581 Free PMC article.
-
Ergonomics of Various Modalities for Ear Surgery.OTO Open. 2024 Jul 4;8(3):e162. doi: 10.1002/oto2.162. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep. OTO Open. 2024. PMID: 38974181 Free PMC article.
-
Female Surgical Ergonomics in Otolaryngology: A National Survey Study.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Mar;170(3):788-794. doi: 10.1002/ohn.568. Epub 2023 Oct 27. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024. PMID: 37890071 Free PMC article.
-
The 3D-Robotic Exoscope Compared With the Microscope in Cochlear Implant and Translabyrinthine Surgery.Laryngoscope. 2025 Jul;135(7):2564-2573. doi: 10.1002/lary.32104. Epub 2025 May 10. Laryngoscope. 2025. PMID: 40346840 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hu Y, Teh BM, Hurtado G, et al. Can endoscopic ear surgery replace microscopic surgery in the treatment of acquired cholesteatoma? A contemporary review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2020;131:109872.
-
- Mudry A. The history of the microscope for use in ear surgery. Am J Otol 2000;21:877–86.
-
- Tarabichi M, Nogueira JF, Marchioni D, et al. Transcanal endoscopic management of cholesteatoma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2013;46:107–30.
-
- Manna S, Kaul VF, Gray ML, Wanna GB. Endoscopic versus microscopic middle ear surgery: a meta-analysis of outcomes following tympanoplasty and stapes surgery. Otol Neurotol 2019;40:983–93.
-
- Jarmula J, de Andrade EJ, Kshettry VR, Recinos PF. The current state of visualization techniques in endoscopic skull base surgery. Brain Sci 2022;12:1337.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources