Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2023 Jul 1;44(6):542-548.
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003858. Epub 2023 Mar 30.

Ergonomic Analysis of Otologic Surgery: Comparison of Endoscope and Microscope

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Ergonomic Analysis of Otologic Surgery: Comparison of Endoscope and Microscope

Annie E Arrighi-Allisan et al. Otol Neurotol. .

Abstract

Objective: The comparative postural health of surgeons performing endoscopic and microscopic otologic surgeries has been a topic of active debate, with many nascent or anecdotal reports suggesting the latter encourages suboptimal ergonomics. Using inertial body sensors to measure joint angles, this study sought to objectively evaluate and compare the ergonomics of surgeons during endoscopic and microscopic otologic surgeries.

Study design: Prospective pilot trial.

Setting: Large, multicenter, academic hospital system. Performed 21 otologic operations (10 endoscopic and 11 microscopic) in November 2020 and January 2021. All attendings were fellowship trained in otology/neurotology.

Subjects: Eight otolaryngologists (four attendings and four residents) performing 21 otologic surgeries (11 microscopic and 10 endoscopic).

Intervention: Approach to otologic surgery: endoscope or microscope.

Main outcome measures: Surgeons' neck and back angles while wearing ergonomic sensors affixed to either side of each major joint, mental and physical burdens and pain after each surgery (via modified NASA Task Load Index).

Results: Residents' necks (9.54° microscopic vs. -4.79° endoscopic, p = 0.04) and backs (16.48° microscopic vs. 3.66° endoscopic, p = 0.01) were significantly more flexed when performing microscopic surgery than when performing endoscopic surgery, although attending neck and back flexion were comparable during microscopic and endoscopic surgeries. Attendings reported significantly higher pain levels after operating microscopically than after operating endoscopically (0.13 vs. 2.76, p = 0.01).

Conclusions: Residents were found to operate with significantly higher risk back and neck postures (as defined by the validated ergonomic tool, Rapid Entire Body Assessment) when operating microscopically. Attendings reported significantly higher levels of pain after operating microscopically versus endoscopically, suggesting that the suboptimal microscopic postures adopted earlier in training may pose an indelible risk later in a surgeon's career.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest to report.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hu Y, Teh BM, Hurtado G, et al. Can endoscopic ear surgery replace microscopic surgery in the treatment of acquired cholesteatoma? A contemporary review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2020;131:109872.
    1. Mudry A. The history of the microscope for use in ear surgery. Am J Otol 2000;21:877–86.
    1. Tarabichi M, Nogueira JF, Marchioni D, et al. Transcanal endoscopic management of cholesteatoma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2013;46:107–30.
    1. Manna S, Kaul VF, Gray ML, Wanna GB. Endoscopic versus microscopic middle ear surgery: a meta-analysis of outcomes following tympanoplasty and stapes surgery. Otol Neurotol 2019;40:983–93.
    1. Jarmula J, de Andrade EJ, Kshettry VR, Recinos PF. The current state of visualization techniques in endoscopic skull base surgery. Brain Sci 2022;12:1337.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources