Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 May 1;109(5):1497-1508.
doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000346.

Management of leaks following one-anastomosis gastric bypass: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 44 318 patients

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Management of leaks following one-anastomosis gastric bypass: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 44 318 patients

Mohammad Kermansaravi et al. Int J Surg. .

Abstract

Introduction: One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) complication, such as leakage, can be dangerous and should be managed properly, yet little data exist in the literature regarding the management of leaks after OAGB, and there are no guidelines to date.

Methods: The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature and 46 studies, examining 44 318 patients were included.

Results: There were 410 leaks reported in 44 318 patients of OAGB published in the literature, which represents a prevalence of 1% of leaks after OAGB. The surgical strategy was very variable among all the different studies; 62.1% of patients with leaks had to undergo another surgery due to the leak. The most commonly performed procedure was peritoneal washout and drainage (with or without T-tube placement) in 30.8% of patients, followed by conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in 9.6% of patients. Medical treatment with antibiotics, with or without total parenteral nutrition alone, was conducted in 13.6% of patients. Among the patients with the leak, the mortality rate related to the leak was 1.95%, and the mortality due to the leak in the population of OAGB was 0.02%.

Conclusion: The management of leaks following OAGB requires a multidisciplinary approach. OAGB is a safe operation with a low leak risk rate, and the leaks can be managed successfully if detected in a timely fashion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot showing the prevalence of leaks among the different studies included in the meta-analysis. ES, effect size.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot showing the prevalence of leak across only primary and revision studies. ES, effect size.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Diagnostic approach of leak after OAGB. CT, computed tomography; OAGB, one-anastomosis gastric bypass.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Suggested algorithm regarding the management of patients with a suspicion of the leak. CT, computed tomography; R/O, rule out; RYGB, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. De Luca M, Tie T, Ooi G, et al. . Mini gastric bypass-one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO position statement. Obes Surg 2018;28:1188–1206. - PubMed
    1. Kermansaravi M, Parmar C, Chiappetta S, et al. . Patient selection in one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass – an expert modified Delphi consensus. Obes Surg 2022;32:2512–2524. - PubMed
    1. Kermansaravi M, Shahmiri SS, Davarpanah Jazi AH, et al. . Reversal to normal anatomy after one-anastomosis/mini gastric bypass, indications and results: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2021;17:1489–1496. - PubMed
    1. Beaupel N, Bruzzi M, Voron T, et al. . Management of acute intra-abdominal sepsis caused by leakage after one anastomosis gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2017;13:1297–1305. - PubMed
    1. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. - PMC - PubMed