Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 1:246:109861.
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109861. Epub 2023 Mar 29.

Measuring vaping-related expectancies in young adults: Psychometric evaluation of the Electronic Nicotine Vaping Outcomes (ENVO) scale

Affiliations

Measuring vaping-related expectancies in young adults: Psychometric evaluation of the Electronic Nicotine Vaping Outcomes (ENVO) scale

Paul T Harrell et al. Drug Alcohol Depend. .

Abstract

Objective: Electronic cigarettes are the most commonly used tobacco products by young adults. Measures of beliefs about outcomes of use (i.e., expectancies) can be helpful in predicting use, as well as informing and evaluating interventions to impact use.

Methods: We surveyed young adult students (N = 2296, Mean age=20.0, SD=1.8, 64 % female, 34 % White) from a community college, a historically black university, and a state university. Students answered ENDS expectancy items derived from focus groups and expert panel refinement using Delphi methods. Factor Analysis and Item Response Theory (IRT) methods were used to understand relevant factors and identify useful items.

Results: A 5-factor solution [Positive Reinforcement (consists of Stimulation, Sensorimotor, and Taste subthemes, α = .92), Negative Consequences (Health Risks and Stigma, α = .94), Negative Affect Reduction (α = .95), Weight Control (α = .92), and Addiction (α = .87)] fit the data well (CFI=0.95; TLI=0.94; RMSEA=0.05) and was invariant across subgroups. Factors were significantly correlated with relevant vaping measures, including vaping susceptibility and lifetime vaping. Hierarchical linear regression demonstrated factors were significant predictors of lifetime vaping after controlling for demographics, vaping ad exposure, and peer/family vaping. IRT analyses indicated that individual items tended to be related to their underlying constructs (a parameters ranged from 1.26 to 3.18) and covered a relatively wide range of the expectancies continuum (b parameters ranged from -0.72 to 2.47).

Conclusions: A novel ENDS expectancy measure appears to be a reliable measure for young adults with promising results in the domains of concurrent validity, incremental validity, and IRT characteristics. This tool may be helpful in predicting use and informing future interventions.

Implications: Findings provide support for the future development of computerized adaptive testing of vaping beliefs. Expectancies appear to play a role in vaping similar to smoking and other substance use. Public health messaging should target expectancies to modify young adult vaping behavior.

Keywords: E-cigarettes; ENDS; Expectancies; Factor analysis; Item response theory; Measurement invariance; Psychometrics; Vaping; Young adult.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest TH Brandon has received research support from Pfizer, Inc. and is on the advisory board of Hava Health, Inc. All other co-authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Option information function plot for Positive Reinforcement (PR) item 1 (“When I vape, the taste is pleasant.”) indicating positive response information for 5 response options (1 = “Strongly Disagree” to 5 = “Strongly Agree”) across levels of latent theta value. Note: Option Response Function Plots for individual response options across levels of theta value available in supplemental Figure 1. Additional Option and Item Response/Information Function Plots available in supplemental Figures 1–3.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abrams DB, Glasser AM, Pearson JL, Villanti AC, Collins LK, & Niaura RS (2018). Harm minimization and tobacco control: reframing societal views of nicotine use to rapidly save lives. Annual review of public health, 39, 193–213. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bentler PM (1990, Mar). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull, 107(2), 238–246. 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bentler PM, & Bonett DG (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588.
    1. Boakye E, Obisesan OH, Osei AD, Dzaye O, Uddin SMI, Hirsch GA, & Blaha MJ (2020, Oct 9). The Promise and Peril of Vaping. Curr Cardiol Rep, 22(12), 155. 10.1007/s11886-020-01414-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bold KW, Kong G, Cavallo DA, Camenga DR, & Krishnan-Sarin S (2017, Dec 13). E-Cigarette Susceptibility as a Predictor of Youth Initiation of E-Cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res, 20(1), 140–144. 10.1093/ntr/ntw393 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types